Page 1 of 1
Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 2:06 am
by rwilliam99
I downloaded the latest beta today (to see if it fixes my USB issues), and when I did a help/about, it shows build 1055, but Steve posted it was build 1056. Did I get the latest version?
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 7:12 am
by Solorize
I can confirm that I also received version 1055 not 1056, may be just a typo.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 8:19 am
by steve
Yes, it's 1055.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 1:32 pm
by Serge F1LXJ
Hello,
May be, since the version 1054 I have air pressure on APRS / CWOP with 6 hpa besides (with the tenth (this is not normal))
I have a WMRS200 station.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 1:56 pm
by steve
Serge F1LXJ wrote:May be, since the version 1054 I have air pressure on APRS / CWOP with 6 hpa besides (with the tenth (this is not normal))
Cumulus has always sent pressure to CWOP/APRS with the tenths included; the protocol requires it.
CWOP/APRS requires 'altimeter pressure' to be sent (pressure corrected to sea level using only altitude for the conversion). For the WMR200, Cumulus has to calculate this by taking the 'station' pressure (i.e. the local, absolute pressure not corrected to sea level) and modifying it based on the altitude that is configured in Cumulus. This code hasn't changed for a very long time.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 2:19 pm
by Serge F1LXJ
Thank you for your fast answer, but i am not sure to really understand my English being limited.
I only saw the problem this morning before installed the 1055.
so another problem,
frozen
it is last days cars and the road are frozen, but the "tag" answers no (0)
it will be can be better to take like reference the apparent temperature.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 2:37 pm
by steve
Serge F1LXJ wrote:it is last days cars and the road are frozen, but the "tag" answers no (0)
it will be can be better to take like reference the apparent temperature.
The <#IsFreezing> tag is for air temperature, not ground temperature. Air temperature is the figure that your station measures; when that is below zero, the <#IsFreezing> tag will give "1". Is your air temperature below zero when the tag gives "0"?
Cumulus has no reliable way of knowing whether there is a ground frost. Apparent Temperature is not suitable for this; it's a measure of how it feels to a human. The Apparent Temperature can be well below zero without there being a ground frost.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 4:14 pm
by rwilliam99
Thank you for the clarification. Will see how this does with my console communication issue.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 4:25 pm
by Serge F1LXJ
For the WMR200, Cumulus has to calculate this by taking the 'station' pressure (i.e. the local, absolute pressure not corrected to sea level) and modifying it based on the altitude that is configured in Cumulus. This code hasn't changed for a very long time.
ok if I understand well, I send a false value that I don't have the possibility to correct, it is terrific.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 5:01 pm
by steve
Serge F1LXJ wrote:ok if I understand well, I send a false value that I don't have the possibility to correct, it is terrific.
Sorry, I don't understand. I'll assume that's a language difficulty and not a sarcastic comment. I don't react well to the latter.
If you think Cumulus is sending incorrect values, then you need to give some examples and show what it is sending and what you think it should be. I've told you what values Cumulus uses to calculate the altimeter pressure, so you need to look at those. The formula Cumulus uses is provided by MADIS.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 5:05 pm
by William Grimsley
Serge F1LXJ wrote:For the WMR200, Cumulus has to calculate this by taking the 'station' pressure (i.e. the local, absolute pressure not corrected to sea level) and modifying it based on the altitude that is configured in Cumulus. This code hasn't changed for a very long time.
ok if I understand well, I send a false value that I don't have the possibility to correct, it is terrific.
Yes, I find this post, slightly confusing.

Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 7:26 pm
by Serge F1LXJ
I repeat it my English is not good, I am sorry, and this is not easy to express me some things, I return in my silence, but I want to say to both of you that I think you've done a wonderful job.
Serge.
Re: Build 1056?
Posted: Mon 10 Dec 2012 7:39 pm
by William Grimsley
Serge F1LXJ wrote:I repeat it my English is not good, I am sorry, and this is not easy to express me some things, I return in my silence, but I want to say to both of you that I think you've done a wonderful job.
Serge.
Hi Serge,
Don't worry about it, I understand now.
Will