Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080

Spurious rain reading

Discussion specific to Fine Offset and similar rebadged weather stations
Post Reply
User avatar
franzliszt
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun 29 Jul 2012 4:30 pm
Weather Station: WH1080-PC
Operating System: Windows 7
Location: Sandy, Beds, UK

Spurious rain reading

Post by franzliszt »

Hi, I've been using my WH1080-PC for about three weeks now, and as has been said elsewhere find it to be excellent value for money. I use it in conjunction with Steve's cumulus software, and the whole system functions well. Only puzzle I have, (and other people have commented on this, but as yet do not have an answer), is a spurious rain reading of 720 inches of rain as a single entry at a time in early August(which I've edited out). Could this be caused by one large "chunk" of water hitting the rain gauge, anyone any ideas? Station is set to 1 minute logging. Many thanks etc
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26672
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: Spurious rain reading

Post by steve »

That amount all at once is more likely to be an 'electronic' problem rather than a 'mechanical' one, i.e. some kind of interference or data corruption, i.e. the rain counter in the transmitter suddenly increased for no reason.
Steve
User avatar
franzliszt
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun 29 Jul 2012 4:30 pm
Weather Station: WH1080-PC
Operating System: Windows 7
Location: Sandy, Beds, UK

Re: Spurious rain reading

Post by franzliszt »

Many thanks Steve - I thought it might be electronic......Regards etc
Post Reply