Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
... when do you believe them!
This morning my station registered a peak gust of 84 mph when the other gusts around that time were in the mid 30's. My record to date is 38 mph.
So I edited this out of the Cumulus records. But then I looked in the garden and things had been blown around that have never moved in the 25 years we have lived here. And whilst lying in bed this morning the whole house shook at times due to the wind.
I can just about imagine a freak gust, but 84 mph seems excessive.
On another note, my FO external temperature used to be in good agreement with Ray's Davis station down the road a few miles (apart from the peak highs/lows), now is seems to be consistently about 2°C below Ray's. I will have to put another thermometer out there to check if the difference is real, due to the FO changing characteristics and Ray's readings changing for some reason.
Argh! If only I could justify a decent station.
This morning my station registered a peak gust of 84 mph when the other gusts around that time were in the mid 30's. My record to date is 38 mph.
So I edited this out of the Cumulus records. But then I looked in the garden and things had been blown around that have never moved in the 25 years we have lived here. And whilst lying in bed this morning the whole house shook at times due to the wind.
I can just about imagine a freak gust, but 84 mph seems excessive.
On another note, my FO external temperature used to be in good agreement with Ray's Davis station down the road a few miles (apart from the peak highs/lows), now is seems to be consistently about 2°C below Ray's. I will have to put another thermometer out there to check if the difference is real, due to the FO changing characteristics and Ray's readings changing for some reason.
Argh! If only I could justify a decent station.
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
Looking at your graphs, 84 mph does seem unlikely, and where you are I would expect that sort of gust to have caused serious damage locally to trees and buildings etc. But it does seem to be quite an 'interesting' day for weather over just about the whole of the UK!
Steve
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
I agree Steve. Now to edit the WOW and WU records 
The next thing to check is the time interval of the 'corruption', I suspect that there is a bad memory location that I'm hitting every time round the buffer - in theory every 28d 8h (with a 10min logging interval). I'm away from home now, but I'll check the alltime ini log file when I get home which should provide the evidence.
The next thing to check is the time interval of the 'corruption', I suspect that there is a bad memory location that I'm hitting every time round the buffer - in theory every 28d 8h (with a 10min logging interval). I'm away from home now, but I'll check the alltime ini log file when I get home which should provide the evidence.
- nking
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Thu 17 Dec 2009 2:03 pm
- Weather Station: W-8681
- Operating System: Windows 10
- Location: Hurstpierpoint, West Sussex, UK
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
The weather is certainly worse than I had expected, I've just had two new records (not 84 mph I might add!).
Highest Wind Gust 46.3 mph at 12:01 on 03 January 2012
Highest Wind Speed Average 30.4 mph at 12:04 on 03 January 2012
A heavy band of rain will soon pass over me here and I may get higher gusts just before, I'll let you know if it's in the 80's
Highest Wind Gust 46.3 mph at 12:01 on 03 January 2012
Highest Wind Speed Average 30.4 mph at 12:04 on 03 January 2012
A heavy band of rain will soon pass over me here and I may get higher gusts just before, I'll let you know if it's in the 80's
-
RayProudfoot
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 06 May 2009 6:29 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2 with Daytime FARS
- Operating System: Windows XP SP3
- Location: Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire, England
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
Mark,
Highest I recorded was 39mph around 7:45 as the cold front came through. I imagine the wind in Wilmslow wouldn't be hugely different. What did the airport record?
If you want to check any of your thermometers against my station you're more than welcome.
Highest I recorded was 39mph around 7:45 as the cold front came through. I imagine the wind in Wilmslow wouldn't be hugely different. What did the airport record?
If you want to check any of your thermometers against my station you're more than welcome.
-
RayProudfoot
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 06 May 2009 6:29 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2 with Daytime FARS
- Operating System: Windows XP SP3
- Location: Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire, England
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
I recorded 43mph later this morning so that's reasonably respectable compared to the airport's open spaces.steve wrote:Peak gust at Ringway seems to be 52 mph.
Mark's 80+ gust is clearly an abberation.
It hasn't been called Ringway for at least 10 years! Manchester International is the fancy new name.
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
It had been renamed from Ringway just before I started at Manchester University in the 1970s, and everyone still called it Ringway, so the name just stuck with me.RayProudfoot wrote:It hasn't been called Ringway for at least 10 years! Manchester International is the fancy new name.
Steve
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
Better than naming them after 'celebrity' who left the area as soon as they could.RayProudfoot wrote:It hasn't been called Ringway for at least 10 years! Manchester International is the fancy new name.
-
RayProudfoot
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 06 May 2009 6:29 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2 with Daytime FARS
- Operating System: Windows XP SP3
- Location: Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire, England
- Contact:
-
wikingmarine
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon 24 Nov 2008 8:26 am
- Weather Station: WH 1080
- Operating System: window server 2003
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
Hi.
My name is Martin and I live in Sweden ( excuase my bad english)
I have a "Fine Offset" WH1080.
Even if the Wind Speed (gust), are much over 30 m/s my station never shows/views more than Wind Speed (gust) 25,4 m/s.
Anybody? Please.
Best regards Martin
www.aquavera.se
My name is Martin and I live in Sweden ( excuase my bad english)
I have a "Fine Offset" WH1080.
Even if the Wind Speed (gust), are much over 30 m/s my station never shows/views more than Wind Speed (gust) 25,4 m/s.
Anybody? Please.
Best regards Martin
www.aquavera.se
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
You are using a very old version of Cumulus.wikingmarine wrote:Even if the Wind Speed (gust), are much over 30 m/s my station never shows/views more than Wind Speed (gust) 25,4 m/s.
Steve
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
Does it show higher wind speeds on the console?wikingmarine wrote:Hi.
My name is Martin and I live in Sweden ( excuase my bad english)
I have a "Fine Offset" WH1080.
Even if the Wind Speed (gust), are much over 30 m/s my station never shows/views more than Wind Speed (gust) 25,4 m/s.
Anybody? Please.
Best regards Martin
http://www.aquavera.se
-
aquavera
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed 04 Jan 2012 1:49 pm
- Weather Station: wh 1080
- Operating System: window server 2003
- Location: sweden
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
Hi.
Yes I know I use an old version. Maybe it will work better if I upgrade?
Yes the Displayconsole shows/views up to 35 m/s,,,but on the site only 25,4 m/s gust (had never been over that value, even in "hurrican"
BR//Martin
www.aquavera.se
Yes I know I use an old version. Maybe it will work better if I upgrade?
Yes the Displayconsole shows/views up to 35 m/s,,,but on the site only 25,4 m/s gust (had never been over that value, even in "hurrican"
BR//Martin
www.aquavera.se
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: The trouble with Fine Offsets is...
Hopefully, yes; that problem was fixed over two years ago.aquavera wrote:Yes I know I use an old version. Maybe it will work better if I upgrade?
Steve