New User - good news with a La crosse weather station
Posted: Mon 28 Nov 2011 7:07 am
Hi, New to this forum but I have been using Cumulus since 6 October after I purchased a La Crosse WS 2306 at end of September of this year:
http://www.sontax.millstream.com.au/vie ... ts/ws2306/
and I have been running Cumulus on a Laptop to download from the data logger at 10 min intervals at the end of each day. The Station came with a serial cable for the data connection but my laptop has only has usb ports. To use the weather station with my laptop I needed a serial to usb converter, which I hope would work, worried by data problems La Crosse station can have.
I bought a usb converter from my local electronics store which I paid $80 for and I have not had a single problem. All data is downloaded perfectly to Heavy Weather (which comes with the station which I don’t like) and Cumulus. I have not had a problem with using this La Crosse station with Cumulus. Must be a good converter to not any corrupt data and spikes in the data.
I have been observing and recording the weather since April 2009 using a basic Oregon Scientific, followed by a La Crosse WS 1600IT making manual records. For many year I am have recording the rain with a manual gauge. The additional weather station allows me to extend my recording apart min and max hum , humidity, max wind gust and so on.
The reason why I am still using both La Crosse units is that because the outdoor units can’t be too far apart (10 metres) I had to put the temp sensor in a spot under the eaves on the north side of the house as this is the only spot in the yard away from buildings and trees and direct sun that would affect the readings, but it does receive radiant heat from the garden.
I know you can extend the cables but I do occasionally lose signal (especially in the first week of running and since then I have not a problem) and extending cables is not something I am keen on, and would be too long for extending it any way.
To site the temp sensor in the right spot without going into shields which I don’t think would help in my case as it seems, would to be the other side of the house which is too long for the cable. At this location it would be exposed to the weather and I would get good readings like as it is now but that would compromise my wind readings with the surrounding trees on that side.
At the front porch where the WS 1600 IT sensor is located is ideal for the day time recordings but I got the new weather station to capture the overnight min and max ( min temp and max humidity) because the porch is protected from the elements and records milder overnight temperature than it actually is. However under the eaves at the current spot overnight tempertures are prefect but the day time ones are not.
Under the eaves elsewhere it either receives direct sunlight or radiant heat from the yard. Anyway between the two station and the help of Cumulus, I have been combining the good min and max readings from weather stationd onto spreadsheets like I had been doing before and so I get good results. But everthing about cumulus are fine such as the graphs. Looks like I had sucess with the La Crosse weather station. Must be lucky.
Anyway Steve you are doing a great job and I have been enjoying using Cumulus.
BTW the help file, wiki and the installation are very useful and full of information.
http://www.sontax.millstream.com.au/vie ... ts/ws2306/
and I have been running Cumulus on a Laptop to download from the data logger at 10 min intervals at the end of each day. The Station came with a serial cable for the data connection but my laptop has only has usb ports. To use the weather station with my laptop I needed a serial to usb converter, which I hope would work, worried by data problems La Crosse station can have.
I bought a usb converter from my local electronics store which I paid $80 for and I have not had a single problem. All data is downloaded perfectly to Heavy Weather (which comes with the station which I don’t like) and Cumulus. I have not had a problem with using this La Crosse station with Cumulus. Must be a good converter to not any corrupt data and spikes in the data.
I have been observing and recording the weather since April 2009 using a basic Oregon Scientific, followed by a La Crosse WS 1600IT making manual records. For many year I am have recording the rain with a manual gauge. The additional weather station allows me to extend my recording apart min and max hum , humidity, max wind gust and so on.
The reason why I am still using both La Crosse units is that because the outdoor units can’t be too far apart (10 metres) I had to put the temp sensor in a spot under the eaves on the north side of the house as this is the only spot in the yard away from buildings and trees and direct sun that would affect the readings, but it does receive radiant heat from the garden.
I know you can extend the cables but I do occasionally lose signal (especially in the first week of running and since then I have not a problem) and extending cables is not something I am keen on, and would be too long for extending it any way.
To site the temp sensor in the right spot without going into shields which I don’t think would help in my case as it seems, would to be the other side of the house which is too long for the cable. At this location it would be exposed to the weather and I would get good readings like as it is now but that would compromise my wind readings with the surrounding trees on that side.
At the front porch where the WS 1600 IT sensor is located is ideal for the day time recordings but I got the new weather station to capture the overnight min and max ( min temp and max humidity) because the porch is protected from the elements and records milder overnight temperature than it actually is. However under the eaves at the current spot overnight tempertures are prefect but the day time ones are not.
Under the eaves elsewhere it either receives direct sunlight or radiant heat from the yard. Anyway between the two station and the help of Cumulus, I have been combining the good min and max readings from weather stationd onto spreadsheets like I had been doing before and so I get good results. But everthing about cumulus are fine such as the graphs. Looks like I had sucess with the La Crosse weather station. Must be lucky.
Anyway Steve you are doing a great job and I have been enjoying using Cumulus.
BTW the help file, wiki and the installation are very useful and full of information.