Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080

rain

Discussion and questions about Cumulus weather station software version 1. This section is the main place to get help with Cumulus 1 software developed by Steve Loft that ceased development in November 2014.
Post Reply
MarkAUS
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon 27 Dec 2010 12:41 am
Weather Station: WH1081
Operating System: Vista premium
Location: CherryBrook NSW Australia
Contact:

rain

Post by MarkAUS »

hi all

We just had a real dumping of rain, im a bit puzzled by the records (see attached)

It states 12.3mm in the last hr but a rain rate of 82m/hr


By the amount of rain... flooding everywhere id have to say the amount was more to the 80mm


do i have a setting wrong?

Thanks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
MickinMoulden
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 12:12 pm
Weather Station: WS-1081 with rain gauge mod
Operating System: Windows 7 & 1.9.3 b1059
Location: Palmerston, NT, Australia
Contact:

Re: rain

Post by MickinMoulden »

MarkAUS wrote:hi all

We just had a real dumping of rain, im a bit puzzled by the records (see attached)

It states 12.3mm in the last hr but a rain rate of 82m/hr


By the amount of rain... flooding everywhere id have to say the amount was more to the 80mm


do i have a setting wrong?

Thanks
Did I beat Steve?......anyway, it's in the FAQ here: http://wiki.sandaysoft.com/a/FAQ#How_is ... culated.3F

I would also suggest getting a manual rain gauge to calibrate it. I found my Wh1081 was originally 9% under reading. Also, the rain gauge is prone to splash out. I would suggest building up the sides (a few cm). If you want to get fancy (I did) get a funnel with about a 260 cm area (165 cm2 is 3 times the original, but read on) to feed into the gauge (and seal it). Make a calibration in Cumulus to multiply your readings by 0.33 (makes each tip read from 0.3mm to 0.1mm) and keep cutting the top off the funnel until it matches what you get in the manual rain gauge.

Everyone else (including me) had originally just made the funnel 3 times bigger (165cm2), or around about, then made adjustments in the Calibration setting (thanks Steve! :D ) till it matched what the manual rain gauge gets. The problem you get with this is that each tip will read an uneven/unusaul amount, like let's say, 0.111mm. I think it would be much nicer if the readings were like .099mm (x 0.33) or .15mm (x 0.5).
Michael, Palmerston, NT Australia www.Palmerston-WeatherImageNo image? I'm offline!
ImageImage
User avatar
MickinMoulden
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 12:12 pm
Weather Station: WS-1081 with rain gauge mod
Operating System: Windows 7 & 1.9.3 b1059
Location: Palmerston, NT, Australia
Contact:

Re: rain

Post by MickinMoulden »

By the way Mark, where are you? Could you please put your approximate location into your profile, thanks.
Also, I notice you're not getting much wind over the last two days, perhaps do as I did, and change your display settings for your wind gauge range. Yours is up to 50kmph, with wind maxing out at 9.7 (this is low hey?). I put mine at 20kmph, so that whatever little wind I have it makes it look more impressive :D , but don't worry, if your wind readings go higher, the gauge doubles (and go to 40kmph, and so on).
Michael, Palmerston, NT Australia www.Palmerston-WeatherImageNo image? I'm offline!
ImageImage
MarkAUS
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon 27 Dec 2010 12:41 am
Weather Station: WH1081
Operating System: Vista premium
Location: CherryBrook NSW Australia
Contact:

Re: rain

Post by MarkAUS »

cheers, loction updated as well :) (must have missed that before)
Post Reply