I've just got one of these weather stations (£70 from Maplin), and I'm really quite impressed with it for the price. As I expected, the bundled software is strictly limited, but Cumulus seems a superb alternative. I've got a couple of questions though:
- Relative Pressure I expected that I would have to enter the station's elevation AMSL to allow it to display a corrected pressure, but it seems to require a corrected value to be fed in directly. I don't have another barometer from which to get such a calibrated value, so I'm not sure how I should go about doing that. Should I just enter the pressure reported from a nearby reliable source?
- Sampling frequency I note that the generated "gauges" web page has real-time wind data, updated every 3 seconds by default. However, I gather from previous postings that these units only sample data every 48 seconds. Is wind data separate and collected more frequently, or should I set my real-time period to 48 seconds also?
Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Newbie questions
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Newbie questions
I don't really know much about these stations (I don't own one), but I believe that is what you have to do, yes.Blackmyre wrote: - Relative Pressure I expected that I would have to enter the station's elevation AMSL to allow it to display a corrected pressure, but it seems to require a corrected value to be fed in directly. I don't have another barometer from which to get such a calibrated value, so I'm not sure how I should go about doing that. Should I just enter the pressure reported from a nearby reliable source?
I believe the station updates all its data at 48-second intervals. You probably want a compromise for your realtime update interval - bear in mind that everything's asynchronous; Cumulus doesn't know when the station has updated (so it reads the data every 10 seconds to try to catch it reasonably quickly after it's updated), the web page doesn't know when the data has changed, etc. The data won't change more often then every 48 seconds, but you may introduce a further delay before new data appears if you have a 48 second interval. It depends on how important it is for you to have the gauges update as soon as possible after a new reading.- Sampling frequency I note that the generated "gauges" web page has real-time wind data, updated every 3 seconds by default. However, I gather from previous postings that these units only sample data every 48 seconds. Is wind data separate and collected more frequently, or should I set my real-time period to 48 seconds also?
Steve
- Budgie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sat 13 Dec 2008 11:01 pm
- Weather Station: LaCrosse WS2300 & Davis VP2
- Location: Isle of Lewis
- Contact:
Re: Newbie questions
For the relative pressure then you're quite lucky that you have at least 3 stations close to you to take the measurement from and compare.
RAF Kinloss: http://weather.noaa.gov/weather/current/EGQK.html
RAF Lossiemouth: http://weather.noaa.gov/weather/current/EGQS.html
Elgin Weather: http://www.elginweather.co.uk/
Elgin Weather is updated every minute or so and the other two are updated every 30 minutes.
RAF Kinloss: http://weather.noaa.gov/weather/current/EGQK.html
RAF Lossiemouth: http://weather.noaa.gov/weather/current/EGQS.html
Elgin Weather: http://www.elginweather.co.uk/
Elgin Weather is updated every minute or so and the other two are updated every 30 minutes.
-
Blackmyre
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Fri 26 Dec 2008 11:55 am
- Weather Station: WH1080
- Location: Dallas, Moray, Scotland
Re: Newbie questions
Thanks both, that all makes sense. Kinloss is the station I tend to use for local weather (less than nine miles, as the Tornado flies).
-
dc1500
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Thu 04 Sep 2008 8:35 am
- Weather Station: Watson W-8681 (Fine Offset type)
- Operating System: Windows 10
- Location: Laindon, S. Essex
- Contact:
Re: Newbie questions
Yes set the relative pressure using Easyweather and anything else you need to adjust or reset before starting upt hen try and ditch Easyweather completely. As has been said before, don't run Cumulus and Easyweather at the same time.
Dave
Dave
-
harrym1byt
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug 2008 5:22 pm
- Weather Station: WH 1081 (EasyWeather type)
- Operating System: Win10
- Location: Garforth, W. Yorks, UK
- Contact:
Re: Newbie questions
The easy way is to run the EasyWeather software and make adjustments in its settings which then get tranferred over to the display.
The most accurate method I have found, is to look at a known to be accurate station as close as possible, which will give a figure every 30 minutes. The data will be old by the time it is posted on the website, so you need to look at your records for the same time their data was logged, to see what the difference is - work out the difference + or - then make a suitable adjustment to the relative figure settings in EW.
That should get you fairly close quickly, but you can then fine tune the figure later should you find any small inaccuracy.
The most accurate method I have found, is to look at a known to be accurate station as close as possible, which will give a figure every 30 minutes. The data will be old by the time it is posted on the website, so you need to look at your records for the same time their data was logged, to see what the difference is - work out the difference + or - then make a suitable adjustment to the relative figure settings in EW.
That should get you fairly close quickly, but you can then fine tune the figure later should you find any small inaccuracy.
-
harrym1byt
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug 2008 5:22 pm
- Weather Station: WH 1081 (EasyWeather type)
- Operating System: Win10
- Location: Garforth, W. Yorks, UK
- Contact:
Re: Newbie questions
The easy way is to run the EasyWeather software and make adjustments in its settings which then get tranferred over to the display.
The most accurate method I have found, is to look at a known to be accurate station as close as possible, which will give a figure every 30 minutes. The data will be old by the time it is posted on the website, so you need to look at your records for the same time their data was logged, to see what the difference is - work out the difference + or - then make a suitable adjustment to the relative figure settings in EW.
That should get you fairly close quickly, but you can then fine tune the figure later should you find any small inaccuracy.
The most accurate method I have found, is to look at a known to be accurate station as close as possible, which will give a figure every 30 minutes. The data will be old by the time it is posted on the website, so you need to look at your records for the same time their data was logged, to see what the difference is - work out the difference + or - then make a suitable adjustment to the relative figure settings in EW.
That should get you fairly close quickly, but you can then fine tune the figure later should you find any small inaccuracy.
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Newbie questions
I kind of miss the Tornadoes, we used to live in Glenlivet. We would sometimes go through Dallas when taking the scenic route to Elgin. Although 'scenic route' is something of a tautology when talking about that part of the world 
Steve
Steve
-
Blackmyre
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Fri 26 Dec 2008 11:55 am
- Weather Station: WH1080
- Location: Dallas, Moray, Scotland
Re: Newbie questions
That would be along the road from Knockando to Dallas, I guess? We're not in the village itself but in the hills a mile and a half to the south-west. You can see our place from the Knockando road if you look across the Lossie to the other side of the glen when you're about a mile or so from Dallas.
The scenery in this part of the world isn't as rugged and spectacular as some of the west coast, but we certainly have no complaints about it
The scenery in this part of the world isn't as rugged and spectacular as some of the west coast, but we certainly have no complaints about it