Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080

CWOP Barometric Pressure Report

Discussion and questions about Cumulus weather station software version 1. This section is the main place to get help with Cumulus 1 software developed by Steve Loft that ceased development in November 2014.
Post Reply
Xonk
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon 04 Jan 2010 7:05 pm
Weather Station: La Crosse WS-2317EL
Operating System: Windows 2000 Server
Location: Swain, Arkansas, USA
Contact:

CWOP Barometric Pressure Report

Post by Xonk »

Upgrading from v1.8.8 to v1.9.0 fixed my barometric pressure error at CWOP. I assume this is the fix referred to?

"Altimeter Pressure now same as SL pressure for non-Davis"

The results of the upgrade are plainly visiable in the quality control graphs.
http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/site/D4194
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26672
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: CWOP Barometric Pressure Report

Post by steve »

I'm surprised there was such a difference. In the old code, it took the absolute pressure and adjusted it using your configured altitude. I realised that this was pointless for non-Davis stations, so changed it to take the supplied sea-level pressure instead. Davis stations display genuine sea-level pressure as opposed to altimeter pressure as required by CWOP. With other stations, the sea-level pressure they provide is actually more like altimeter pressure, i.e. it is only adjusted for altitude, so the later code just uses that.

It should only have made a significant difference, assuming you had configured your altitude correctly, if your station's absolute pressure reading was some way off and you were having to over-compensate with your relative pressure setting, i.e. you are compensating for both altitude and an inaccurate reading.

But anyway, it's good that the change was of some benefit.
Steve
Xonk
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon 04 Jan 2010 7:05 pm
Weather Station: La Crosse WS-2317EL
Operating System: Windows 2000 Server
Location: Swain, Arkansas, USA
Contact:

Re: CWOP Barometric Pressure Report

Post by Xonk »

Calibrating the barometer seems to be a difficult task. The La Crosse stations do not have a direct setting for altitude - so it's a guess work thing. And since the console pressure reading and WeatherUnderground and PWS take Relative Pressure in inches while CWOP wants a different value, and in millibars too, it's even more confusing. But - the only change was at CWOP - the Cumulus screen, the WS 2317 console, WeatherUnderground and PWS did not show the sudden, instantaneous jump in pressure CWOP recorded.

I'd been researching here and on the CWOP forums for advice on this issue. It is the primary reason I upgraded to v1.9.0, not that I expected it to resolve the problem - but I knew I should be running the latest version before I brought the issuet up. So I was most pleased when the upgrade fixed things.

I don't know if this is relevant?
http://server.gladstonefamily.net/piper ... 11752.html
steve wrote:I'm surprised there was such a difference. In the old code, it took the absolute pressure and adjusted it using your configured altitude. I realised that this was pointless for non-Davis stations, so changed it to take the supplied sea-level pressure instead. Davis stations display genuine sea-level pressure as opposed to altimeter pressure as required by CWOP. With other stations, the sea-level pressure they provide is actually more like altimeter pressure, i.e. it is only adjusted for altitude, so the later code just uses that.

It should only have made a significant difference, assuming you had configured your altitude correctly, if your station's absolute pressure reading was some way off and you were having to over-compensate with your relative pressure setting, i.e. you are compensating for both altitude and an inaccurate reading.

But anyway, it's good that the change was of some benefit.
Post Reply