Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Animation Factor
-
wd40
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2010 10:02 pm
- Weather Station: WS2080
- Operating System: W7
- Location: GA, USA
- Contact:
Animation Factor
I have enjoyed playing with the new gauge.
With my Fine Offset I have the Animation Factor set at 40. Is there a good sense limit on the setting?
I assume the demand on the CPU to make the animation of the pointer is not there when Cumulus is minimized to the tray. Is that correct?
Randy
With my Fine Offset I have the Animation Factor set at 40. Is there a good sense limit on the setting?
I assume the demand on the CPU to make the animation of the pointer is not there when Cumulus is minimized to the tray. Is that correct?
Randy
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
The animation does use a lot of CPU. It uses very little when minimised.
40 seems very slow to me, but it's up to you, really.
40 seems very slow to me, but it's up to you, really.
Steve
-
SUBYDAZZ
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri 01 Jan 2010 1:04 pm
- Weather Station: Oregon Scientific WMR200
- Operating System: Windows 11
- Location: Singleton, NSW, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
What does the value of the factor represent, update frequency? Is the default 2?
- daj
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue 29 Jul 2008 8:00 pm
- Weather Station: WH1081
- Operating System: Pi & MX
- Location: SW Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
The default is 2 -- not sure what the unit is. The smaller the number the faster. I like 20!
2 means you hardly see the needle move as it jumps straight from one to the other almost instantly
Basically is represents how quickly the pointer moves from one figure to another as the wind speed changes.
2 means you hardly see the needle move as it jumps straight from one to the other almost instantly
Basically is represents how quickly the pointer moves from one figure to another as the wind speed changes.
-
wd40
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2010 10:02 pm
- Weather Station: WS2080
- Operating System: W7
- Location: GA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
20 is what settled on as well.daj wrote: I like 20!
I wonder if there could be an over shoot setting to let it go past the wind speed then come back like you see on internet speed test pages?
Randy
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
Me neither...daj wrote:not sure what the unit is.
True. The default is 2 because that's about as slow as it can be with a Davis station with its 2 to 3 second update interval.2 means you hardly see the needle move as it jumps straight from one to the other almost instantly
Steve
- daj
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue 29 Jul 2008 8:00 pm
- Weather Station: WH1081
- Operating System: Pi & MX
- Location: SW Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
Ah, I am in the cheap seats with a 48 second update from the FineOffset brandsteve wrote: The default is 2 because that's about as slow as it can be with a Davis station with its 2 to 3 second update interval.
- Ned
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2010 11:15 am
- Weather Station: WS2083 (aspirated)
- Operating System: Win 10
- Location: Auckland NZ
Re: Animation Factor
I've been using 10, but when Cumulus is stopped overnight, it takes an awful long time to download the logged data next morning as the speed pointer faithfully animates all the changes in wind speed. I have over 100 records stored every night and might have to reduce the animation (or turn it off before switch off), but am wondering if the animation can be suspended when a lot of data is being downloaded?
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
Hmm, that's interesting. I haven't found that to be the case - on my development machine, with my Fine Offset station, and quite a high animation factor, it doesn't seem to take significantly longer to process the logger data than it used to.Ned wrote:it takes an awful long time to download the logged data next morning as the speed pointer faithfully animates all the changes in wind speed.
But it does make sense to turn off the animation during the logger download so I'll do that - it's easy enough to do. The only reason I don't stop the display in general updating during download (and I know some people find it entertaining anyway) is that there isn't really any easy way to do it.
Steve
-
wd40
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2010 10:02 pm
- Weather Station: WS2080
- Operating System: W7
- Location: GA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
I was left with the thought this morning that it did take a bit longer but I am talking seconds here for the download with or without the animation turned on so it didn't carry much weight with me.
Randy
Randy
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
As an experiment, I've just started Cumulus up on my dev machine with animation turned on (factor 40) to download overnight logger entries. It downloaded 81 entries, and it took 8 seconds from the time it started updating the display. I turned animation off and used the backup to repeat; it took 6 seconds.
Steve
- nking
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Thu 17 Dec 2009 2:03 pm
- Weather Station: W-8681
- Operating System: Windows 10
- Location: Hurstpierpoint, West Sussex, UK
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
That's quite a price to pay for animation. I always knew that keeping still saved time 
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
Yes, two whole seconds. Just think what I could have been doing with my time insteadnking wrote:That's quite a price to pay for animation.
Steve
- Ned
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2010 11:15 am
- Weather Station: WS2083 (aspirated)
- Operating System: Win 10
- Location: Auckland NZ
Re: Animation Factor
On bootup this morning I set the watch going from the first appearance of the Cumulus screen until the data upload finished (105 records). 2 minutes 15 seconds.
OK, I think Avast does a virus memory scan at the same time, so that's probably taking it's toll on this old computer, but it's surely slower than it used to be.
I'll disable animation tonight and see how it goes tomorrow - if I remember
OK, I think Avast does a virus memory scan at the same time, so that's probably taking it's toll on this old computer, but it's surely slower than it used to be.
I'll disable animation tonight and see how it goes tomorrow - if I remember
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Animation Factor
I didn't mean my experiment to be demonstrating that turning off the animation was unnecessary (and I've already done the changes), just to confirm my suspicion that it wasn't significantly slower for me. My development PC isn't exactly state of the art, but I accept that many people will be running Cumulus on spare/old hardware - my weather PC has a Pentium 4 in it and a not very smart graphics card.
Steve