Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080

WH1080 / WH1090 differences

Discussion specific to Fine Offset and similar rebadged weather stations
Post Reply
pns1953
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010 12:06 pm
Weather Station: Watson 8681 (ie Fine Offset)
Operating System: Raspberry Pi with MX
Location: Milford, Surrey, UK
Contact:

WH1080 / WH1090 differences

Post by pns1953 »

After contemplating constructing / purchasing a W.S. for more years than I care to admit (my first plans involved a BBC Micro :o ) I think I'm about to be tempted by one of the 'cheap and cheerful' Fine Offset products - it looks as if it could give me a lot of fun until such a time when I could contemplate something a bit better.
Maplins have a good offer on the WH1080 at present - but I'm aware that this has now been superseded by the WH1090.
Some research on this forum revealed some old posts which seem to indicate that the only difference between the two is a receiver console which has better (and adjustable) contrast.
Since I would intend to run Cumulus and access the info on-line most of the time, I probably am not too bothered with the poor contrast of the 1080 console if that really is the only difference - it doesn't seem worth paying another £25 for the 1090.

Can anyone confirm whether or not there are any other differences between the two models - or otherwise compare and contrast functionality / reliability?

Thanks
Phil
User avatar
Ned
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2010 11:15 am
Weather Station: WS2083 (aspirated)
Operating System: Win 10
Location: Auckland NZ

Re: WH1080 / WH1090 differences

Post by Ned »

Heh, I cut my teeth on a BBC Micro, which I still have (somewhere) ;)
I've got the WH1091, and it also suffers from poor (even when maximised) contrast. The important part of the station are the sensors, and they appear to be identical among the Fine Offset variants.
After installing Cumulus, I rarely bother to look at the console, and would go for the cheapest model if I had to replace the system.
Gina
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat 21 Feb 2009 12:41 pm
Weather Station: Nothing working ATM - making one
Operating System: OS X, Linux Mint, Win7 & XP
Location: Devon UK

Re: WH1080 / WH1090 differences

Post by Gina »

I had a BBC Micro too :) And before that a Sinclair ZX81 complete with wobbly memory pack and tiny, smelly, burnt paper printer :lol: And I'm still messing with computers :) I have the Maplins weather station and have had great fun with it. Probably much more fun than one of the expensive professional ones :lol:
Gina

Sorry, no banner - weather station out of action. Hoping to be up and running with a new home-made one soon.
Synewave
Posts: 642
Joined: Mon 25 Jan 2010 1:55 pm
Weather Station: Watson W-8681
Operating System: Raspian
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: WH1080 / WH1090 differences

Post by Synewave »

Gina wrote:And before that a Sinclair ZX81 complete with wobbly memory pack and tiny, smelly, burnt paper printer
Yes, I had a ZX81 too. Programs on a cassette tape, I even took part in the Tomorrows World tv experiment where they played the 'noise' of a program which viewers captured using a mic against the TV speaker and then loaded it into the ZX81.

I sold my ZX81 for just over £100, I was working at Dixons at the time and had wind that the Spectrum was coming out soon.

Shows my age and realising it is totally 'off-topic' (sorry Steve)!
Post Reply