Today (March 31st) I looked at rainfall for this month and saw 2.1mm
when I look at the stats for the month I see (as expected) 37.3mm
It seems to me something is wrong with the rainfall for display (and the site feeds too as its wrong on the web site).
I also ran an averages and extremes for 1/3/2010 to 31/3/2010 and its comes up with a 'months' rainfall of 26.4 NOT the 37.3 of the 'This Month' display above
Checked all dates and times etc and cant see anything odd but it does look to me as though the main display (and web feeds) have reset the monthly rainfall yesterday as though it thinks March is only 30 days long?
Anyone else seen this?
Cumulus 1.8.8b881
Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
something wrong with rainfall results
-
stevew
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sun 01 Mar 2009 3:23 pm
- Weather Station: WS2350 (via serial)
- Operating System: win7/Linux
- Location: Redwood Lake, Reading
- Contact:
something wrong with rainfall results
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: something wrong with rainfall results
Could you zip up and attach your diags folder, and also your Mar10log.txt and dayfile.txt, please?
Steve
-
stevew
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sun 01 Mar 2009 3:23 pm
- Weather Station: WS2350 (via serial)
- Operating System: win7/Linux
- Location: Redwood Lake, Reading
- Contact:
Re: something wrong with rainfall results
diags and data files attached
Also I noticed files for April and May in the data folder which seems very odd as they are in the furture?
Also I noticed files for April and May in the data folder which seems very odd as they are in the furture?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: something wrong with rainfall results
It looks like you've been having problems with the clock on your station. This does seem to happen quite often with La Crosse stations, although when I've seen this before the clock has been reset to the year 2000. Yours seems to be close to the current date.
This is dayfile.txt, a bit of a mess, due to problems with the date read from the station:
27/03/10,11.4,247,13:45,5.5,23:44,14.9,13:25,1000.7,00:03,1011.0,23:25,0.0,00:00,0.0,9.5,22.5
21/04/10,4.7,180,17:39,5.1,23:39,14.2,14:39,1010.9,00:00,1021.0,20:39,0.0,00:00,0.0,9.5,12.8
22/04/10,5.8,112,17:39,3.5,23:39,13.8,13:39,1016.1,18:39,1020.3,00:39,0.2,18:39,0.5,7.9,32.4
23/04/10,8.5,112,11:39,-0.5,06:39,11.3,11:39,1010.9,23:39,1020.0,02:39,0.2,18:39,1.6,6.2,37.1
24/04/10,5.8,112,13:39,7.0,06:39,18.6,14:39,1002.0,23:39,1010.9,00:39,0.3,23:39,1.6,11.5,34.0
25/04/10,10.5,112,15:39,7.5,21:39,14.3,11:39,995.9,17:39,1002.0,00:39,1.7,18:39,13.0,10.5,72.3
26/04/10,9.4,68,09:39,6.5,05:39,13.1,15:39,999.4,00:39,1002.1,07:39,0.2,23:39,1.0,9.5,46.8
27/04/10,3.8,248,10:39,5.8,04:39,14.8,14:39,1001.0,00:39,1010.7,22:39,0.2,00:39,0.0,9.6,31.3
27/03/10,2.2,225,00:39,4.1,04:39,13.8,13:39,1008.4,13:39,1011.0,01:39,0.0,00:39,0.0,7.5,5.8
28/03/10,8.3,247,14:55,7.8,21:53,14.2,15:39,1004.6,23:29,1008.4,14:06,1.5,23:31,2.6,10.4,7.2
29/03/10,112.0,315,12:40,6.9,05:22,12.4,12:55,991.8,23:58,1005.2,00:30,2.6,17:42,6.2,9.3,38.9
24/04/10,19.7,90,12:30,4.3,20:10,18.6,14:39,983.7,13:29,1008.0,03:39,1.0,07:53,3.7,10.0,82.3
25/04/10,10.5,112,15:39,7.5,21:39,14.3,11:39,995.9,17:39,1002.0,00:39,1.7,18:39,13.0,10.5,72.3
26/04/10,9.4,68,09:39,6.5,05:39,13.1,15:39,999.4,00:39,1002.1,07:39,0.2,23:39,1.0,9.5,46.8
27/04/10,3.8,248,10:39,5.8,04:39,14.8,14:39,1001.0,00:39,1010.7,22:39,0.2,00:39,0.0,9.6,31.3
28/04/10,3.6,202,15:39,4.1,04:39,14.1,15:39,1004.8,23:39,1011.0,01:39,0.5,23:39,2.6,8.7,9.4
29/04/10,4.9,68,13:39,7.0,05:39,11.9,13:39,992.0,23:39,1005.1,00:39,0.6,17:39,6.2,9.3,31.1
30/04/10,12.3,68,13:39,4.0,22:39,11.9,12:39,983.7,13:39,992.0,00:39,0.2,07:39,2.1,7.7,52.8
30/03/10,6.3,112,03:39,2.8,05:39,5.0,02:39,982.6,04:39,986.8,00:39,0.3,04:39,2.1,3.7,27.1
When you started Cumulus at 10:13 this morning, the station clock was apparently reading 09:39 on the 1st May:
2010-03-31 10:13:45 : WS2300 History Details: Data: 3B 90 01 39 09 01 05 10 5D AF
2010-03-31 10:13:45 : interval=60 countdown=26 numrecords=175
2010-03-31 10:13:45 : hr=9 min=39 d=1 m=5 y=2010
Similarly, when you started Cumulus at 14:05 yesterday, the station clock was apparently reading 13:39 on the 28th April:
2010-03-28 14:05:20 : WS2300 History Details: Data: 3B 10 02 39 13 28 04 10 19 AF
2010-03-28 14:05:20 : interval=60 countdown=34 numrecords=175
2010-03-28 14:05:20 : hr=13 min=39 d=28 m=4 y=2010
Could you have a look at the console and see what date and time it is currently showing?
This is dayfile.txt, a bit of a mess, due to problems with the date read from the station:
27/03/10,11.4,247,13:45,5.5,23:44,14.9,13:25,1000.7,00:03,1011.0,23:25,0.0,00:00,0.0,9.5,22.5
21/04/10,4.7,180,17:39,5.1,23:39,14.2,14:39,1010.9,00:00,1021.0,20:39,0.0,00:00,0.0,9.5,12.8
22/04/10,5.8,112,17:39,3.5,23:39,13.8,13:39,1016.1,18:39,1020.3,00:39,0.2,18:39,0.5,7.9,32.4
23/04/10,8.5,112,11:39,-0.5,06:39,11.3,11:39,1010.9,23:39,1020.0,02:39,0.2,18:39,1.6,6.2,37.1
24/04/10,5.8,112,13:39,7.0,06:39,18.6,14:39,1002.0,23:39,1010.9,00:39,0.3,23:39,1.6,11.5,34.0
25/04/10,10.5,112,15:39,7.5,21:39,14.3,11:39,995.9,17:39,1002.0,00:39,1.7,18:39,13.0,10.5,72.3
26/04/10,9.4,68,09:39,6.5,05:39,13.1,15:39,999.4,00:39,1002.1,07:39,0.2,23:39,1.0,9.5,46.8
27/04/10,3.8,248,10:39,5.8,04:39,14.8,14:39,1001.0,00:39,1010.7,22:39,0.2,00:39,0.0,9.6,31.3
27/03/10,2.2,225,00:39,4.1,04:39,13.8,13:39,1008.4,13:39,1011.0,01:39,0.0,00:39,0.0,7.5,5.8
28/03/10,8.3,247,14:55,7.8,21:53,14.2,15:39,1004.6,23:29,1008.4,14:06,1.5,23:31,2.6,10.4,7.2
29/03/10,112.0,315,12:40,6.9,05:22,12.4,12:55,991.8,23:58,1005.2,00:30,2.6,17:42,6.2,9.3,38.9
24/04/10,19.7,90,12:30,4.3,20:10,18.6,14:39,983.7,13:29,1008.0,03:39,1.0,07:53,3.7,10.0,82.3
25/04/10,10.5,112,15:39,7.5,21:39,14.3,11:39,995.9,17:39,1002.0,00:39,1.7,18:39,13.0,10.5,72.3
26/04/10,9.4,68,09:39,6.5,05:39,13.1,15:39,999.4,00:39,1002.1,07:39,0.2,23:39,1.0,9.5,46.8
27/04/10,3.8,248,10:39,5.8,04:39,14.8,14:39,1001.0,00:39,1010.7,22:39,0.2,00:39,0.0,9.6,31.3
28/04/10,3.6,202,15:39,4.1,04:39,14.1,15:39,1004.8,23:39,1011.0,01:39,0.5,23:39,2.6,8.7,9.4
29/04/10,4.9,68,13:39,7.0,05:39,11.9,13:39,992.0,23:39,1005.1,00:39,0.6,17:39,6.2,9.3,31.1
30/04/10,12.3,68,13:39,4.0,22:39,11.9,12:39,983.7,13:39,992.0,00:39,0.2,07:39,2.1,7.7,52.8
30/03/10,6.3,112,03:39,2.8,05:39,5.0,02:39,982.6,04:39,986.8,00:39,0.3,04:39,2.1,3.7,27.1
When you started Cumulus at 10:13 this morning, the station clock was apparently reading 09:39 on the 1st May:
2010-03-31 10:13:45 : WS2300 History Details: Data: 3B 90 01 39 09 01 05 10 5D AF
2010-03-31 10:13:45 : interval=60 countdown=26 numrecords=175
2010-03-31 10:13:45 : hr=9 min=39 d=1 m=5 y=2010
Similarly, when you started Cumulus at 14:05 yesterday, the station clock was apparently reading 13:39 on the 28th April:
2010-03-28 14:05:20 : WS2300 History Details: Data: 3B 10 02 39 13 28 04 10 19 AF
2010-03-28 14:05:20 : interval=60 countdown=34 numrecords=175
2010-03-28 14:05:20 : hr=13 min=39 d=28 m=4 y=2010
Could you have a look at the console and see what date and time it is currently showing?
Steve
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: something wrong with rainfall results
The problems with the station date seem to have started when BST started. But looking back, even before then the station clock seems to have been an hour or so out, e.g showing 20:40 at 21:18.
2010-03-12 21:18:46 : WS2300 History Details: Data: 3B 50 01 40 20 12 03 10 AE AF
2010-03-12 21:18:46 : interval=60 countdown=22 numrecords=175
2010-03-12 21:18:46 : hr=20 min=40 d=12 m=3 y=2010
2010-03-12 21:18:46 : WS2300 History Details: Data: 3B 50 01 40 20 12 03 10 AE AF
2010-03-12 21:18:46 : interval=60 countdown=22 numrecords=175
2010-03-12 21:18:46 : hr=20 min=40 d=12 m=3 y=2010
Steve
-
stevew
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sun 01 Mar 2009 3:23 pm
- Weather Station: WS2350 (via serial)
- Operating System: win7/Linux
- Location: Redwood Lake, Reading
- Contact:
Re: something wrong with rainfall results
Station clock is time correct 11:37 but date is May 1st by the look of it 
I guess its a matter of writing off the data files and restarting or trying to paste them back together
I guess its a matter of writing off the data files and restarting or trying to paste them back together
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: something wrong with rainfall results
It's tricky. All the data will be there but anything read from the archive data will be incorrectly timestamped. You would have to work out the correct timestamp for each entry in the monthly logs, and also recreate the dayfile.txt entries.stevew wrote:I guess its a matter of writing off the data files and restarting or trying to paste them back together
I'll look into flashing an error if the La Crosse station clock is a long way off the current time, past or future.
Steve
-
stevew
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sun 01 Mar 2009 3:23 pm
- Weather Station: WS2350 (via serial)
- Operating System: win7/Linux
- Location: Redwood Lake, Reading
- Contact:
Re: something wrong with rainfall results
whats the easiest way to reset the data, delete the content of the data folder?
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: something wrong with rainfall results
If by "reset" you mean start again from scratch, then yes. But do you really want to do that just for a few days of data?stevew wrote:whats the easiest way to reset the data, delete the content of the data folder?
Steve