Can someone remind me about the 48 second rule for the FineOffset.....is it that the station only updates data every 48 seconds, therefore Cumulus is potentially waiting 48 seconds for a new packet of data?
I know Cumulus checks every few seconds for data but where does the 48 seconds come in to it
thanks
Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
The 48 seconds rule for the FineOffset
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: The 48 seconds rule for the FineOffset
Yes, the station updates every 48 seconds; I think that probably corresponds to how often the remote sensor transmits. Cumulus reads the data every 10 seconds because it doesn't know when the station is going to update.
Steve
- daj
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue 29 Jul 2008 8:00 pm
- Weather Station: WH1081
- Operating System: Pi & MX
- Location: SW Scotland
- Contact:
Re: The 48 seconds rule for the FineOffset
Thanks
It got me thinking about the real-time thing again -- updating my site every 5 seconds, whereas at some point in the 48 second window I am getting one real update
It got me thinking about the real-time thing again -- updating my site every 5 seconds, whereas at some point in the 48 second window I am getting one real update
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: The 48 seconds rule for the FineOffset
Yes - a 40 to 50 second interval would make more sense - provided you are willing to accept the fact that your 'real time' data may actually be from some time in the past. Take the case of a wind gust. In the worst case, the gust occurs, 48 seconds later the station updates, 10 seconds later Cumulus reads the data, 40 seconds later (say) the real time update occurs, and the data is already nearly 100 seconds old. Your web site may then have another delay before it reads the new data and updates (e.g. the Flash or Silverlight gauges). But does it matter if the data is a minute or two old? Who knows or cares?
Steve
- daj
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue 29 Jul 2008 8:00 pm
- Weather Station: WH1081
- Operating System: Pi & MX
- Location: SW Scotland
- Contact:
Re: The 48 seconds rule for the FineOffset
Yeah, I think it is all about managing your visitors expectations. If I am updating every 5 seconds they are probably expecting something to change. Whereas if I am updating in 30 seconds something will possibly change on the next refresh 
- Repairman77
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Sat 17 Oct 2009 3:47 pm
- Weather Station: WH1080
- Operating System: XP pro SP3
- Location: Cambridgeshire UK
Re: The 48 seconds rule for the FineOffset
But does it matter if the data is a minute or two old? Who knows or cares?
Absolutely Steve; unless you are one of those people who sits in front of the console watching it all day, LOL.
Mike.
Absolutely Steve; unless you are one of those people who sits in front of the console watching it all day, LOL.
Mike.
Retired Radio and Electronics Engineer residing in Cambridgeshire, UK.
- daj
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Tue 29 Jul 2008 8:00 pm
- Weather Station: WH1081
- Operating System: Pi & MX
- Location: SW Scotland
- Contact:
Re: The 48 seconds rule for the FineOffset
I think I will put a note on the Wiki under the realtime section about the 48 second rule for the FineOffset stations
-
Gina
- Posts: 1885
- Joined: Sat 21 Feb 2009 12:41 pm
- Weather Station: Nothing working ATM - making one
- Operating System: OS X, Linux Mint, Win7 & XP
- Location: Devon UK
Re: The 48 seconds rule for the FineOffset
I have a strange delay with my weathercam. Something like 20 minutes!! I haven't been able to pin it down other than it's in the webcam software. I'm planning to include the webcam in my weather station software rather than running it as a separate entity with separate FTP etc. Maybe then I can sort this out. Not really of any great consequence but it's bugging me a bit and it's strange around dusk, to look out the window and it's dark but the webcam is still showing quite a good picture. The reverse happens at dawn, of course. I know this delay exists because I set up a large faced clock on a pole in view of the webcam. Oddly, it makes no difference if I use a fast or slow computer to handle it. Nor does the capture rate make a difference. Most peculiar.
I was thinking of a fast update for the weather data but decided that data being 10 or 15 mins out of date is of no consequence. The only thing that would look nice to have updated more frequently are the wind dials, as in Cumulus. But OTOH instantaneous wind speed and direction are really rather meaningless anyway. I think it's really just that we are used to seeing movement and a moving gauge looks more interesting than a static one.
So I've decided to go for 5 min data sampling with FTP uploads every 10 or 15 mins, though I may leave the webcam on 5 min intervals - not sure yet.
One thing I would rather like to implement is a time-lapse view of the weathercam showing clouds racing across the sky and rain showers etc. too. I think that would be rather neat
For that, a capture rate faster than 5mins would be preferred. My trials with a frame every 5m produce a very fast video
Think I'm fantasising again....
I was thinking of a fast update for the weather data but decided that data being 10 or 15 mins out of date is of no consequence. The only thing that would look nice to have updated more frequently are the wind dials, as in Cumulus. But OTOH instantaneous wind speed and direction are really rather meaningless anyway. I think it's really just that we are used to seeing movement and a moving gauge looks more interesting than a static one.
So I've decided to go for 5 min data sampling with FTP uploads every 10 or 15 mins, though I may leave the webcam on 5 min intervals - not sure yet.
One thing I would rather like to implement is a time-lapse view of the weathercam showing clouds racing across the sky and rain showers etc. too. I think that would be rather neat
Gina
Sorry, no banner - weather station out of action. Hoping to be up and running with a new home-made one soon.
Sorry, no banner - weather station out of action. Hoping to be up and running with a new home-made one soon.
-
hills
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Sat 26 Dec 2009 8:52 am
- Weather Station: Fine Offset WH1091
- Operating System: Raspbian Buster
- Location: Crafers, South Australia
- Contact:
Re: The 48 seconds rule for the FineOffset
I used to use Cumulus to upload my webcam image every 5 minutes, so with yawcam taking a snapshot every 5 minutes I could potentially be 10 minutes behind, however I have now changed over to yawcam uploading it every minute and so far it has been 100% reliable and my webcam image is never more than about a minute old. Luckily uploads and downloads to/from my ISP are in the freezone so don't affect my monthly quota.