Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
Moderator: mcrossley
- KF0KFL-13
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2023 6:08 pm
- Weather Station: Ambient WS-2902
- Operating System: Libre Computer Raspberry PI
- Location: White Bear Lake, MN, USA
- Contact:
Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
I use Cumulus MX to generate a wxnow file for my APRS weather station. I've noticed the pressure was a lot lower compared to nearby stations. I took my dial barometer to a nearby airport to calibrate it to sea level, then adjusted my Ambient WS2902 accordingly. I noticed it was still reporting low. I'm thinking the pressure going to the wxnow file is absolute or something else!
I've attached some data that will hopefully help.
Thanks in advance!
I've attached some data that will hopefully help.
Thanks in advance!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
KF0KFL-13 https://bit.ly/43Xtq6O
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14382
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
Cumulus uses Altimeter pressure for APRS and CWOP.
Is your station altitude set correctly in both Cumulus and the console?
Cumulus calculates the altimeter pressure for your station from the absolute (or station) pressure and altitude. Is the absolute pressure reading correct?
Is your station altitude set correctly in both Cumulus and the console?
Cumulus calculates the altimeter pressure for your station from the absolute (or station) pressure and altitude. Is the absolute pressure reading correct?
- KF0KFL-13
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2023 6:08 pm
- Weather Station: Ambient WS-2902
- Operating System: Libre Computer Raspberry PI
- Location: White Bear Lake, MN, USA
- Contact:
Re: Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
I'm pretty confident the pressure is set correctly. I never had any issues before. Tonight I'm going to roll in back to previous version to see if it fixes my issue. As I look at it now, what my station reads in InHg doesn't convert convert to what's being pushed out to the wxnow in millbars..... At least going by Google's conversion
KF0KFL-13 https://bit.ly/43Xtq6O
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14382
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
Cumulus has used altimeter pressure since v1.9.4
What has changed is that for some stations it set altimeter = what the station supplied as sea level pressure. The Davis station have always had a true altimiter pressure value as well as sea level. The Ecowitt had a "dummy" sea level value in altimeter until MX v4.0.0 when MX started calculating the altimeter pressure.
How does the wxnow pressure value compare with a local QNH value?
What has changed is that for some stations it set altimeter = what the station supplied as sea level pressure. The Davis station have always had a true altimiter pressure value as well as sea level. The Ecowitt had a "dummy" sea level value in altimeter until MX v4.0.0 when MX started calculating the altimeter pressure.
How does the wxnow pressure value compare with a local QNH value?
- KF0KFL-13
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2023 6:08 pm
- Weather Station: Ambient WS-2902
- Operating System: Libre Computer Raspberry PI
- Location: White Bear Lake, MN, USA
- Contact:
Re: Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
Can you explain what a QNH station is?
Thanks
Thanks
KF0KFL-13 https://bit.ly/43Xtq6O
-
freddie
- Posts: 2870
- Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2011 11:19 am
- Weather Station: Davis Vantage Pro 2 + Ecowitt
- Operating System: GNU/Linux Ubuntu 24.04 LXC
- Location: Alcaston, Shropshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
Any airfield supplying a METAR will report its QNH (altimeter) pressure. I think you're in the USA so it will be in inches of mercury. If you look at the raw METAR report, it is the value preceded by an A.
Example for LA International:
Code: Select all
KLAX 080553Z 31004KT 10SM SCT014 SCT030 BKN200 12/12 A3011 RMK AO2 SLPNO T01220122 10156 20122Source: https://aviationweather.gov/data/metar/?ids=KLAX
- KF0KFL-13
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2023 6:08 pm
- Weather Station: Ambient WS-2902
- Operating System: Libre Computer Raspberry PI
- Location: White Bear Lake, MN, USA
- Contact:
Re: Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
Ok! I wasn't able to successfully roll back to an older version. I'm continuing to run the latest CMX version. In calibration settings I increased the offset of the station pressure by +0.08inhg. So far it seems to compare with nearby stations and reflect what the RELATIVE pressure on my station and dial gauge is showing. I'm guessing that CMX uses my stations ABSOLUTE pressure and calculates it for altitude for the wxnow file... instead of the stations RELATIVE pressure going to the wxnow file. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you
Update:
Reread a previous reply. It confirmed my guess.
Thank you mcrossly
Update:
Reread a previous reply. It confirmed my guess.
Thank you mcrossly
mcrossley wrote: ↑Thu 06 Feb 2025 11:54 am Cumulus uses Altimeter pressure for APRS and CWOP.
Is your station altitude set correctly in both Cumulus and the console?
Cumulus calculates the altimeter pressure for your station from the absolute (or station) pressure and altitude. Is the absolute pressure reading correct?
Last edited by KF0KFL-13 on Sat 08 Feb 2025 2:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
KF0KFL-13 https://bit.ly/43Xtq6O
- KF0KFL-13
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2023 6:08 pm
- Weather Station: Ambient WS-2902
- Operating System: Libre Computer Raspberry PI
- Location: White Bear Lake, MN, USA
- Contact:
Re: Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
Thanks Freddiefreddie wrote: ↑Sat 08 Feb 2025 6:12 amAny airfield supplying a METAR will report its QNH (altimeter) pressure. I think you're in the USA so it will be in inches of mercury. If you look at the raw METAR report, it is the value preceded by an A.
Example for LA International:The A3011 is the QNH value - decodes to 30.11 inches.Code: Select all
KLAX 080553Z 31004KT 10SM SCT014 SCT030 BKN200 12/12 A3011 RMK AO2 SLPNO T01220122 10156 20122
Source: https://aviationweather.gov/data/metar/?ids=KLAX
KF0KFL-13 https://bit.ly/43Xtq6O
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14382
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
You are correct. Altimeter is calculated for stations that do not supply it AND provide an absolute (station) pressure.KF0KFL-13 wrote: ↑Sat 08 Feb 2025 2:04 pm Ok! I wasn't able to successfully roll back to an older version. I'm continuing to run the latest CMX version. In calibration settings I increased the offset of the station pressure by +0.08inhg. So far it seems to compare with nearby stations and reflect what the RELATIVE pressure on my station and dial gauge is showing. I'm guessing that CMX uses my stations ABSOLUTE pressure and calculates it for altitude for the wxnow file... instead of the stations RELATIVE pressure going to the wxnow file. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you
Note: Ecowitt recently changed their pressure calculations, for many stations in recent firmware they now do a "proper" sea level pressure calculation rather than a simple offset relative pressure.
- KF0KFL-13
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat 17 Jun 2023 6:08 pm
- Weather Station: Ambient WS-2902
- Operating System: Libre Computer Raspberry PI
- Location: White Bear Lake, MN, USA
- Contact:
Re: Baramotetric Pressure not reporting correctly
Thanks mcrossly
mcrossley wrote: ↑Sat 08 Feb 2025 2:23 pmYou are correct. Altimeter is calculated for stations that do not supply it AND provide an absolute (station) pressure.KF0KFL-13 wrote: ↑Sat 08 Feb 2025 2:04 pm Ok! I wasn't able to successfully roll back to an older version. I'm continuing to run the latest CMX version. In calibration settings I increased the offset of the station pressure by +0.08inhg. So far it seems to compare with nearby stations and reflect what the RELATIVE pressure on my station and dial gauge is showing. I'm guessing that CMX uses my stations ABSOLUTE pressure and calculates it for altitude for the wxnow file... instead of the stations RELATIVE pressure going to the wxnow file. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you
Note: Ecowitt recently changed their pressure calculations, for many stations in recent firmware they now do a "proper" sea level pressure calculation rather than a simple offset relative pressure.
KF0KFL-13 https://bit.ly/43Xtq6O