This whole weather forecasting twilight-zone is confusing to most of us (if I can be so brave as to speak for the majority). Meterologists have entire computers dedicated to running multiple models and gps-based sensors based added to historical data going back years and years in order to draw a "probable" conclusion and best-guess prophecy. To add to the confusion, each region is broken down into specific geographic parameters with multiple models for each of them.
That being said, it'd be great to predict, with some accuracy, what's going to happen tomorrow based on what's happening right now. I think most of us would really enjoy that. But if it were that simple, they could sack most of the meterologists and pay us! (hey...its a thought!)
If temp goes this way, and pressure goes that way and wind goes that other way what does it mean? Without historical perspective, it probably means nothing at all. Personally, I turn to NOAA for forecasts cuz...hey!...they have the money and means to put this array of hardware together. If I ever developed a forecast based on the data I have at hand...and it was accurate...I'd probably make a promise to Buddha to swear off ale forever.
Nevertheless, thanks to Steve for trying to help us all to better understand the meaning? of all this data.
