I set up Cumulus around January 17, 2010. In the initial settings I put in .46 inches rain to date. We have had some rain since the 17th. The "rainfall this year" is accurate. However, the "rainfall this month" is short by .46. Is this because Cumulus doesnt recognize that January is the first month and the rainfall for the month should be the same as the fainfall for the year?
Obviouosly the rainfall for the month (and year) will be accurate starting in Feb.
Just curious.
Thanks
Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Rainfall Total question
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Rainfall Total question
The 'year to date rainfall' is just applied to the year to date, not to any month. It just happens to be January, so in this case it would make sense to apply the whole amount to this month. If it were not January, it would not. So it doesn't, it just applies it to the annual total, and the monthly totals are unaffected. Which I think is the same as what you're saying, yes.
Steve