I have just setup my WH1081 to send data to APRS and have noticed that the pressure reported is 1013.7 which should be absolute adjusted by elevation (120ft or 36.5M). WH1081 Absolute reads 1009.5 my relative is 1015.9 so I guess from this the WH1081 is not very accurate for absolute and therefore the adjusted figure sent to aprs is useless. Have I understood this situation correctly and is there a workaround. I haven't played with the offsets as I didn't want to corrupt my data logging in Cumulus
I hope this all makes sense and hope someone can clarify for me - Thanks
Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
CWOP air prerssure data
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: CWOP air prerssure data
Yes, your reading of the situation is correct. I changed the way Cumulus does pressure for CWOP so that it correctly sends Altimeter Pressure rather than MSLP. It was really Davis users that needed the change because the Davis stations calculate MSLP properly, whereas other stations clearly do not. For consistency, I changed the code for all station types. Since then, I've been mulling over whether I did the right thing, precisely for the reason you have highlighted; the Fine Offset stations are clearly not very accurate at measuring absolute pressure, and there is no way to correct the calculated altimeter pressure other than fudging your altitude.
I think I will change the code (back) so that Cumulus sends the standard relative/sea-level pressure to CWOP for non-Davis stations.
I think I will change the code (back) so that Cumulus sends the standard relative/sea-level pressure to CWOP for non-Davis stations.
Steve
- nking
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Thu 17 Dec 2009 2:03 pm
- Weather Station: W-8681
- Operating System: Windows 10
- Location: Hurstpierpoint, West Sussex, UK
- Contact:
Re: CWOP air prerssure data
Thanks for clarifying the point. I am conscious of the difficulty that exists with your time and I for one would feel happy if you said NO to making any changes to C1 (unless it’s a really critical issue that stops C1 running) and that you will try to incorporate this into C2. This would then ease the conflict that exists and help you focus your energy to delivering C2…… just a thought 
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: CWOP air prerssure data
Well... you could say it's a bug, really, and I should fix bugs.nking wrote:Thanks for clarifying the point. I am conscious of the difficulty that exists with your time and I for one would feel happy if you said NO to making any changes to C1 (unless it’s a really critical issue that stops C1 running) and that you will try to incorporate this into C2. This would then ease the conflict that exists and help you focus your energy to delivering C2…… just a thought
Steve