Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080

CWOP air prerssure data

Discussion specific to Fine Offset and similar rebadged weather stations
Post Reply
User avatar
nking
Posts: 813
Joined: Thu 17 Dec 2009 2:03 pm
Weather Station: W-8681
Operating System: Windows 10
Location: Hurstpierpoint, West Sussex, UK
Contact:

CWOP air prerssure data

Post by nking »

I have just setup my WH1081 to send data to APRS and have noticed that the pressure reported is 1013.7 which should be absolute adjusted by elevation (120ft or 36.5M). WH1081 Absolute reads 1009.5 my relative is 1015.9 so I guess from this the WH1081 is not very accurate for absolute and therefore the adjusted figure sent to aprs is useless. Have I understood this situation correctly and is there a workaround. I haven't played with the offsets as I didn't want to corrupt my data logging in Cumulus

I hope this all makes sense and hope someone can clarify for me - Thanks
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26672
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: CWOP air prerssure data

Post by steve »

Yes, your reading of the situation is correct. I changed the way Cumulus does pressure for CWOP so that it correctly sends Altimeter Pressure rather than MSLP. It was really Davis users that needed the change because the Davis stations calculate MSLP properly, whereas other stations clearly do not. For consistency, I changed the code for all station types. Since then, I've been mulling over whether I did the right thing, precisely for the reason you have highlighted; the Fine Offset stations are clearly not very accurate at measuring absolute pressure, and there is no way to correct the calculated altimeter pressure other than fudging your altitude.

I think I will change the code (back) so that Cumulus sends the standard relative/sea-level pressure to CWOP for non-Davis stations.
Steve
User avatar
nking
Posts: 813
Joined: Thu 17 Dec 2009 2:03 pm
Weather Station: W-8681
Operating System: Windows 10
Location: Hurstpierpoint, West Sussex, UK
Contact:

Re: CWOP air prerssure data

Post by nking »

Thanks for clarifying the point. I am conscious of the difficulty that exists with your time and I for one would feel happy if you said NO to making any changes to C1 (unless it’s a really critical issue that stops C1 running) and that you will try to incorporate this into C2. This would then ease the conflict that exists and help you focus your energy to delivering C2…… just a thought :|
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26672
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: CWOP air prerssure data

Post by steve »

nking wrote:Thanks for clarifying the point. I am conscious of the difficulty that exists with your time and I for one would feel happy if you said NO to making any changes to C1 (unless it’s a really critical issue that stops C1 running) and that you will try to incorporate this into C2. This would then ease the conflict that exists and help you focus your energy to delivering C2…… just a thought :|
Well... you could say it's a bug, really, and I should fix bugs.
Steve
Post Reply