Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
3202 Alarms broken
Moderator: mcrossley
-
bduren
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Tue 21 Jul 2009 8:43 am
- Weather Station: WMR928
- Operating System: W2012R2, W10, RaspberryPI 3+
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
3202 Alarms broken
Hello
Not able to start after update.
I have done mono CreateMissing.exe
Repaired 3 errors.
After that try to start.
First time CMX complained regarding Wind
Second start CMX complained regarding rain.
Second MXdiags attached.
Not able to start after update.
I have done mono CreateMissing.exe
Repaired 3 errors.
After that try to start.
First time CMX complained regarding Wind
Second start CMX complained regarding rain.
Second MXdiags attached.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
Please disable your rain alarm in Cumulus.ini and try restarting.
And I'll take a look later at what is going on.
Code: Select all
[Alarms]
HighRainTodayAlarmSet=0
HighRainRateAlarmSet=0
IsRainingAlarmSet=0
-
bduren
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Tue 21 Jul 2009 8:43 am
- Weather Station: WMR928
- Operating System: W2012R2, W10, RaspberryPI 3+
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
Hello
Did that to no avail, sorry.
Reverting to 3196 and working good
Attach the latest MXdiags file.
Thanks for taking a look at the issue.
Did that to no avail, sorry.
Reverting to 3196 and working good
Attach the latest MXdiags file.
Thanks for taking a look at the issue.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
OK, so the Wind alarms have the same issue. It looks like the Alarms are not being created for your station type for some reason. I'll take a look at the code tomorrow, looks like I missed something for a particular set of stations that includes the WMR-928 (they do not all initialise in the same way).
-
sfws
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Fri 27 Jul 2012 11:29 am
- Weather Station: Chas O, Maplin N96FY, N25FR
- Operating System: rPi 3B+ with Buster (full)
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
I use the old Fine Offset station type, and in new release have already checked some Alarms are working for me. My MX runs normally on a RPi without me checking what is happening.
I think the behaviour for the "data spike" functionality might have changed when the new code for determining when to skip reading data was introduced in release 3.19.0. It appears a reading was made of all zeroes, when MX was synchronising, that triggered the "data spike" alarm, and that alarm never cleared until I stopped MX and restarted with new release, while all other alarms I had enabled with similar settings had worked as normal (trigger and clearing).
I did not have time to investigate before I installed the new release today, Since I have archived all the files from my MXDiags, with some spare time it would be possible to search for when that particular alarm was triggered and when not cleared.
I have not being able to test the "data spike" functionality yet on new release, as there has been no trigger of it yet.
I think the behaviour for the "data spike" functionality might have changed when the new code for determining when to skip reading data was introduced in release 3.19.0. It appears a reading was made of all zeroes, when MX was synchronising, that triggered the "data spike" alarm, and that alarm never cleared until I stopped MX and restarted with new release, while all other alarms I had enabled with similar settings had worked as normal (trigger and clearing).
I did not have time to investigate before I installed the new release today, Since I have archived all the files from my MXDiags, with some spare time it would be possible to search for when that particular alarm was triggered and when not cleared.
I have not being able to test the "data spike" functionality yet on new release, as there has been no trigger of it yet.
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
Thanks, the alarms got another internal work-over in v3.20.0, functionality that was spread around is now encapsulated in the alarm class. That meant the initialisation of them had to change, it looks like I didn't catch all initialisation routes. No time tonight, but I'll take a look tomorrow.
- rogerthn
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Thu 11 Apr 2013 6:31 pm
- Weather Station: Ecowitt GW1000/GW1003
- Operating System: Raspberry Pi OS bullseye aarch64
- Location: Trollhättan Sweden
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
To start with I did have
After some time
in 32022022-08-21 16:45:52.525 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 1.60V (OK) dummy value?
After some time
2022-08-21 22:00:03.349 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 0.31V (Low)
2022-08-21 22:00:03.351 Alarm (Battery Low): Sending email

- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
Sorry, not sure what you are saying?rogerthn wrote: ↑Sun 21 Aug 2022 8:11 pm To start with I did havein 32022022-08-21 16:45:52.525 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 1.60V (OK) dummy value?
After some time2022-08-21 22:00:03.349 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 0.31V (Low)
2022-08-21 22:00:03.351 Alarm (Battery Low): Sending email
The alarm looks like it is working OK.
- rogerthn
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Thu 11 Apr 2013 6:31 pm
- Weather Station: Ecowitt GW1000/GW1003
- Operating System: Raspberry Pi OS bullseye aarch64
- Location: Trollhättan Sweden
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
WH40 battery level is a dummy value?
Enclosing diag from first run of 3202 Edit: Maybe not a dummy.
I'll replace batteries tomorrow
Good Night
Enclosing diag from first run of 3202 Edit: Maybe not a dummy.
I'll replace batteries tomorrow
Good Night
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
The problem is there are different versions of the WH40, newer versions report the battery voltage. Older ones do not, but report a dummy value of 1.6 V. So if the value is reported as 1.6V there is no way of knowing if it is a dummy value, or a real value that just happens to match the dummy value! 
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
@bduren, if you still have one, could you post the ServiceConsoleLog.txt file please?
- rogerthn
- Posts: 549
- Joined: Thu 11 Apr 2013 6:31 pm
- Weather Station: Ecowitt GW1000/GW1003
- Operating System: Raspberry Pi OS bullseye aarch64
- Location: Trollhättan Sweden
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
I was "lucky" that there was 0.31 for some time!mcrossley wrote: ↑Sun 21 Aug 2022 9:01 pm The problem is there are different versions of the WH40, newer versions report the battery voltage. Older ones do not, but report a dummy value of 1.6 V. So if the value is reported as 1.6V there is no way of knowing if it is a dummy value, or a real value that just happens to match the dummy value!![]()
I do have a reminder, Replace battery on the 5th of November but thanks to the mail I now have signal = 4 again on the WH402022-08-21 21:52:25.659 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 0.31V (Low)
2022-08-21 22:00:03.349 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 0.31V (Low)
2022-08-21 22:20:03.694 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 0.31V (Low)
2022-08-21 22:40:01.149 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 1 battery = 1.60V (OK) dummy value?
2022-08-21 23:00:00.492 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 1.60V (OK) dummy value?
2022-08-21 23:20:00.594 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 1.60V (OK) dummy value?
Code: Select all
2022-08-22 16:40:03.132 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 0 battery = 1.60V (OK) dummy value?
2022-08-22 17:00:00.662 - WH40 sensor id = 55050 signal = 4 battery = 1.60V (OK) dummy value?

-
bduren
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Tue 21 Jul 2009 8:43 am
- Weather Station: WMR928
- Operating System: W2012R2, W10, RaspberryPI 3+
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Re: 3202 Alarms broken
Hello
Here it is, the ServiceConsoleLog corresponding to the mxdiag I send earlier
Here it is, the ServiceConsoleLog corresponding to the mxdiag I send earlier
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.