Page 1 of 1

Can Cumulus publish archived data onto web in graphs?

Posted: Sat 02 Jan 2010 10:36 am
by muppet77
I have the basic webpage setup and saw in "trends" that the graphs are only for one day. Is it possible for a simpleton like me to tweak it so they show a variety of date spans?

Re: Can Cumulus publish archived data onto web in graphs?

Posted: Sat 02 Jan 2010 10:49 am
by steve
You can frig the timespan by editing cumulus.ini - "GraphHours" value. But watch out for it changing back to the default if you change anything on the settings screen. Alternatively, just for the web, you can use one of the methods that various people have devised for drawing their own graphs, or invent your own.

Re: Can Cumulus publish archived data onto web in graphs?

Posted: Sat 02 Jan 2010 11:18 am
by TNETWeather
No website is listed so I can't check, but if you have PHP abilities, you could use the JPGraph PHP charts I created to get up to 72 hours worth of info charted dynamically on your website.

More information available via: http://cumulus.tnetweather.com/samp-graph.php

Re: Can Cumulus publish archived data onto web in graphs?

Posted: Sat 02 Jan 2010 11:19 am
by muppet77
Brilliant thanks steve.
I will have a tinker in a bit.

If I would like graphs for 24 hours and also for eg 72 hours do I just put the same line in that file twice?

Or I suspect it is more complicated?

Re: Can Cumulus publish archived data onto web in graphs?

Posted: Sat 02 Jan 2010 11:24 am
by muppet77

Re: Can Cumulus publish archived data onto web in graphs?

Posted: Sat 02 Jan 2010 11:45 am
by steve
muppet77 wrote:If I would like graphs for 24 hours and also for eg 72 hours do I just put the same line in that file twice?
You can only choose one setting.

Re: Can Cumulus publish archived data onto web in graphs?

Posted: Sat 02 Jan 2010 11:47 am
by TNETWeather
Might be complicated as you are running on an MS IIS server. I have little experience with those and don't know if they finally started to include PHP yet or what kind of support they would have for that. In the past, that was just plain a no go...

Sorry...