Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Cumulus MX V4 beta test release 4.0.0 (build 4018) - 28 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release v1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014 (a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

GW1000 WiFi gateway
User avatar
mcrossley
Posts: 12694
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by mcrossley »

This was unexpected!

I finally got round to mounting the WS80 on top of my 10 metre pole along with the VP2.

I was expecting the WS80 gust values to exceed the VP2, however this is what I am getting - I have deliberately chosen a day where there was a calm period over night.
compare-vp2-ws80-gust.jpg
As you can see the VP2 is consistently measuring higher gust speeds than the WS80. It is only when the wind dropped below 4 mph that I see the WS80 consistently giving higher values.

Next looking at the average speeds for the same day, the WS80 is reading quite a bit lower than the VP2. That is until the wind speed drops below 2 mph, when the WS80 again tends to give higher values.
compare-vp2-ws80-avg.jpg
Finally I did a sanity check that the WS80 wind speeds being recorded by CMX agreed with those on Ecowitt.net.
You can see that they agree, within the bounds of Ecowitt.net using a 5 minute average period, and CMX using a 10 minute average.
compare-ws80-cmx-ecowitt.jpg
I'm not sure what to make of this yet, but I thought it was sufficiently interesting to share these early results.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
HansR
Posts: 5871
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2012 6:53 am
Weather Station: GW1100 (WS80/WH40)
Operating System: Raspberry OS/Bullseye
Location: Wagenborgen (NL)
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by HansR »

Indeed, interesting and unexpected.

I never had both running side by side and always had the feeling the WS80 was too high and it took me 6 months before I settled with the device and agreed with the data. I must say the storms we had this year did not help: since the first storm we had a lot of wind on average and though it felt as a lot of wind I had a difficulty believing the numbers. Switching the devices around that time did not help :?

This exercise helps in accepting the ws80.
I must say that the 'flatlining' and other errors which needed to be fixed did not help. Good to see everything is a bit calming down and that the numbers are OK.

Thanks for the exercise :clap:
Hans

https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl
CMX build 4017+ ● RPi 3B+ ● Raspbian Linux 6.1.21-v7+ armv7l ● dotnet 8.0.3
User avatar
mcrossley
Posts: 12694
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by mcrossley »

I have also seen cases where the WS80 seems to give higher gust values than the VP2, these results have now sown the seeds of a thought that they may be inconsistent?

One thought was that the calibration of the WS80 was out, but the fact that it reads higher speeds in near calm conditions seems to rule that out, you expect it to drop to zero like the VP2 if it were under reading.
freddie
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2011 11:19 am
Weather Station: Davis Vantage Pro 2 + Ecowitt
Operating System: GNU/Linux Ubuntu 22.04 LXC
Location: Alcaston, Shropshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by freddie »

The low speed response is fantastic - no more worries about the physics of inertia!
Your other findings are, as you say, unexpected. Do you have a correction factor on the mechanical sensor? If not, then the only reason I can think of is that the software within the ultrasonic device needs calibrating.
Freddie
Image
User avatar
HansR
Posts: 5871
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2012 6:53 am
Weather Station: GW1100 (WS80/WH40)
Operating System: Raspberry OS/Bullseye
Location: Wagenborgen (NL)
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by HansR »

mcrossley wrote: Mon 09 May 2022 4:12 pm One thought was that the calibration of the WS80 was out, but the fact that it reads higher speeds in near calm conditions seems to rule that out, you expect it to drop to zero like the VP2 if it were under reading.
Not necessarily, as the measurement is software calculated it could easily have different calcs for different speed ranges. We would need to see the software to know that.
Hans

https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl
CMX build 4017+ ● RPi 3B+ ● Raspbian Linux 6.1.21-v7+ armv7l ● dotnet 8.0.3
User avatar
HansR
Posts: 5871
Joined: Sat 20 Oct 2012 6:53 am
Weather Station: GW1100 (WS80/WH40)
Operating System: Raspberry OS/Bullseye
Location: Wagenborgen (NL)
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by HansR »

freddie wrote: Mon 09 May 2022 4:50 pm The low speed response is fantastic - no more worries about the physics of inertia!
Your other findings are, as you say, unexpected. Do you have a correction factor on the mechanical sensor? If not, then the only reason I can think of is that the software within the ultrasonic device needs calibrating.
Not sure how to calibrate the software but it would not surprise me if Ecowitt would fine-tune its firmware and we would see some upgrades in future (as we had already)
Hans

https://meteo-wagenborgen.nl
CMX build 4017+ ● RPi 3B+ ● Raspbian Linux 6.1.21-v7+ armv7l ● dotnet 8.0.3
User avatar
mcrossley
Posts: 12694
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by mcrossley »

freddie wrote: Mon 09 May 2022 4:50 pm The low speed response is fantastic - no more worries about the physics of inertia!
Your other findings are, as you say, unexpected. Do you have a correction factor on the mechanical sensor? If not, then the only reason I can think of is that the software within the ultrasonic device needs calibrating.
No calibration factors in place for either device - other than a 180 direction shift for the WS80 as it has to stick out the south side of my pole. But that means it is clean air for our predominately S-SW winds.

Firmware upgrades on the WS80 are something I'd dread, I hate working at height on a ladder with no protection! They would also mean unbolting the WS80 and bringing it indoors to update via USB - a major undertaking, so I hope they do not update too often!
User avatar
mcrossley
Posts: 12694
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by mcrossley »

And to complete the set, here is a comparison of the average wind direction (10 mins) for the VP2 and WS80...
.
compare-vp2-ws80-dir.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
RayProudfoot
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed 06 May 2009 6:29 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2 with Daytime FARS
Operating System: Windows XP SP3
Location: Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire, England
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by RayProudfoot »

Interesting exercise Mark. I suspect many of us who have our anemometer positioned on the roof would love to have one that never needs attention.

But if firmware updates can only be applied to the sonic version by accessing it where is the advantage? The latest Hall-effect anemometer with a cartridge replacement is the best yet and hopefully will last a very long time. But it will need some attention from time to time so both of them require access for different reasons.

What’s the advantage of the sonic over the current model? It’s lost on me.
Cheers,
Ray, Cheshire.

Image
freddie
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2011 11:19 am
Weather Station: Davis Vantage Pro 2 + Ecowitt
Operating System: GNU/Linux Ubuntu 22.04 LXC
Location: Alcaston, Shropshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by freddie »

RayProudfoot wrote: Wed 11 May 2022 5:20 pm What’s the advantage of the sonic over the current model? It’s lost on me.
No moving parts.
Excellent low speed response.
Theoretically will record more accurate gust speeds.
Freddie
Image
RayProudfoot
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed 06 May 2009 6:29 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2 with Daytime FARS
Operating System: Windows XP SP3
Location: Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire, England
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by RayProudfoot »

freddie wrote: Wed 11 May 2022 6:49 pm No moving parts.
Excellent low speed response.
Theoretically will record more accurate gust speeds.
That wasn’t obvious in Mark’s evidence. Is the response time better than the conventional anemometer of 2.5 secs. That would be of interest.
Cheers,
Ray, Cheshire.

Image
freddie
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2011 11:19 am
Weather Station: Davis Vantage Pro 2 + Ecowitt
Operating System: GNU/Linux Ubuntu 22.04 LXC
Location: Alcaston, Shropshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by freddie »

RayProudfoot wrote: Wed 11 May 2022 6:58 pm
freddie wrote: Wed 11 May 2022 6:49 pm No moving parts.
Excellent low speed response.
Theoretically will record more accurate gust speeds.
That wasn’t obvious in Mark’s evidence. Is the response time better than the conventional anemometer of 2.5 secs. That would be of interest.
If you're thinking of the Davis 2.5 second polling time, then no that won't change. It's more to do with the frictional effects at low speeds, and more accurate gusts due to absence of any inertial physics effects.
Freddie
Image
RayProudfoot
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed 06 May 2009 6:29 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2 with Daytime FARS
Operating System: Windows XP SP3
Location: Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire, England
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by RayProudfoot »

Thanks Freddie.
Cheers,
Ray, Cheshire.

Image
User avatar
mcrossley
Posts: 12694
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by mcrossley »

The WS80 updates every 4.75 seconds, the new WS90 updates every 8.8 seconds (it's not clear to me yet if the WS80 will be discontinued when the WS90 is generally available).

For me I think the VP2 cups are a better option. No batteries to change, recalibration, or firmware updates required.
freddie
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2011 11:19 am
Weather Station: Davis Vantage Pro 2 + Ecowitt
Operating System: GNU/Linux Ubuntu 22.04 LXC
Location: Alcaston, Shropshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Comparison of WS80 wind speeds against Davis VP2

Post by freddie »

I thought Ray was talking about the Davis ultrasonic anemo? :lol:
Freddie
Image
Post Reply