I guess I'm just going to going to have to wait for more strikes. I'll let you know, thanks for your assistance.
Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
WeatherFlow Tempest Lightning Sensor
Moderator: mcrossley
-
ahagadorn
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2022 1:24 pm
- Weather Station: Davis Vantage Pro 2
- Operating System: Debian Linux
- Location: Piedmont, SC
- Contact:
Re: WeatherFlow Tempest Lightning Sensor
-
cliftonweather
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat 14 Nov 2009 12:34 pm
- Weather Station: Vantage pro+
- Operating System: RPi3 Model 3 running Buster
- Location: Clifton, Beds
- Contact:
Re: WeatherFlow Tempest Lightning Sensor
You do have the 'Use the lightning sensor data from your Ecowitt' ticked in 'Settings' - 'Extra Sensor Settings'- 'Use a HTTP Station for extra sensors' - 'Ecowitt' - 'Lightning'?
- mcrossley
- Posts: 14388
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: WeatherFlow Tempest Lightning Sensor
That setting is worth checking, but it should not affect the Tempest data as the tempest station does not take it into account and applies it's own data anyway.
The tempest is odd in that the lightning and rainfall displayed in the app and web page is not necessarily the same as that recorded by the station. They process the data and compare it nearby stations and come up with a number. Personally I prefer a station that reports what it has measured.
As I understand it, the rainfall is processed because of the nature of the sensor which does not measure water volume or weight but counts drops and is inherently subject to large variances. Ecowitt have the same problems with their haptic rainfall sensor on the WS90. Ecowitt are trying to solve it by allowing the user the tweak all sorts of gain values; from what I have seen it is still unreliable.
The tempest is odd in that the lightning and rainfall displayed in the app and web page is not necessarily the same as that recorded by the station. They process the data and compare it nearby stations and come up with a number. Personally I prefer a station that reports what it has measured.
As I understand it, the rainfall is processed because of the nature of the sensor which does not measure water volume or weight but counts drops and is inherently subject to large variances. Ecowitt have the same problems with their haptic rainfall sensor on the WS90. Ecowitt are trying to solve it by allowing the user the tweak all sorts of gain values; from what I have seen it is still unreliable.