rogerthn wrote: ↑Sat 08 Aug 2020 8:17 am
That's the Dutch Swedish translations done
Don't understand Dutch/Swedish
Your initial install should have had the English Language initially.
But anyway, I see your site in English and not Swedish so what exactly do you mean?
If you did finish the Swedish translation, then could you upload it in the language sharing thread please? Thanks!
rogerthn wrote: ↑Sat 08 Aug 2020 8:17 am
Daily program as below seems to work
OK, nice procedures, may be useful to others. Apparently you use a daily rollover at 10h00 (summertime, 9h00 wintertime). I would use a 5 second sleep as your data will increase (take more time) and some people may e.g. use a Pi Zero[W] which will definitely slow it all down.
FYI: I use crontab with the following entries:
Code: Select all
5 1 * * * cd /home/CumulusMX; ./cumulusutils.exe thrifty website
0 2 * * * cd /home/CumulusMX; ./cumulusutils.exe mapson
And subsequently I do a sysinfo every 10 minutes of the hour:
Code: Select all
# Do the sysinfo such that Cumulus can process it in time
09 * * * * cd /home/CumulusMX; ./cumulusutils.exe sysinfo
19 * * * * cd /home/CumulusMX; ./cumulusutils.exe sysinfo
29 * * * * cd /home/CumulusMX; ./cumulusutils.exe sysinfo
39 * * * * cd /home/CumulusMX; ./cumulusutils.exe sysinfo
49 * * * * cd /home/CumulusMX; ./cumulusutils.exe sysinfo
59 * * * * cd /home/CumulusMX; ./cumulusutils.exe sysinfo
Note that at 2 o'clock at night two instances will run. Under Linux they will both use the same log file which may be confusing if you don't expect it.
rogerthn wrote: ↑Sat 08 Aug 2020 8:17 am
PS
pwsFWI in upper left seems to require page refresh (CTRL F5) to display value from today?
No.
PwsFWI is calculated from the dayfile (and won't change until next day) and the value which is presented as the current value is always calculated on yesterdays values. Today is still a prediction from the values in the prediction file. This has been discussed before - see the original release thread - and seems to be confusing. However, the moisture processes in a forest are slow. If it suddenly gets hot - as it does now in the Netherlands - it takes some time for the pwsFWI to reach true higher fire danger levels. So I decided to let the Current Value only be the value based on the last measured data. This is inline with the 'smoothing' and 'quenching' procedures which ease the rise and fall of the pwsFWI value and are based/inspired on the slowness of absorption / release of water by forests and wood. This is a complex process about which a lot has been written. You could start with
this blog in which I point to a google search on
'moisture content dampening forest'.
In short: pwsFWI is not a rapidly changing value.