As I said in that topic, I'm not the right person to suggest what should be the structure, but l can make a few suggestions, shoot them down if you hate them, refine them if you find them helpful.
- Some points (like the one I am making now) may span both Cumulus 1 and Cumulus MX so there should be a sub-forum that spans both, so people don't have to pick MX or 1 for general points, and maybe the station make specific queries sub-fora e.g. Davis in viewforum.php?f=6 should move into that
- People sometimes suggest one or more posts should be moved (see this that was actioned viewtopic.php?f=11&t=17847&p=138200&hilit=wiki#p138201, it could be easier for administrators if perhaps there was a request to administrators/coders type sub-forum? It could also include a place to suggest changes to (or potential problems with) MX to keep those separate from postings that just want help with using it? It could also be useful to separate out the posts that to some extent are documentary, like the start/stop routine?
- In the previous posting I suggested that the MX announcements made by Steve and those made since Mark started enhancing MX were in separate topics. So much has changed in MX that many of Steve's remarks no longer have any relevance. Also Steve had an approach of listing issues and marking them with line through once they were addressed, viewtopic.php?f=27&t=12943 that is partly still accurate and partly confusing, but a replacement pending issues/additions marking of progress might be useful - I know Mark says he does not have time for documentation and asked for volunteers, but I guess he does have a list in his head or somewhere of what he still wants to add to MX? (e.g. some features in Cumulus 1 not yet added?)
- There has in past been confusion between what counts as third party tools viewforum.php?f=18 and what is put in say Web Site - general viewforum.php?f=14 and maybe now Mark has a new list in Wiki about user contributions https://cumuluswiki.org/a/User_Contributions, that terminology should be adopted, so for example we separate postings about beteljuice's contributions that do not have their own sub-forum in the same way as Ken True has a sub-forum? All those sub-fora are then grouped under user contributions. I say this because "website development" might not be best title when some people make suggestions about exporting, about using spreadsheets, and other issues that relate to use of information on web sites rather than their development. Also being perdantic I would say development refers to when you do that work yourself, rather than "borrow" or make use of somebody else's work!
Do you just just press the button "Active" (or use an equivalent bookmark) or do you choose which sub forum to look in. How often do you look at this support forum, is it only when you need to find something out, or is it because you are interested in learning from others? Do you get annoyed about some topic titles and wish there was some better grouping that would let you look at what interests you?