Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080

WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Discussion specific to Fine Offset and similar rebadged weather stations
User avatar
beteljuice
Posts: 3292
Joined: Tue 09 Dec 2008 1:37 pm
Weather Station: None !
Operating System: W10 - Threadripper 16core, etc
Location: Dudley, West Midlands, UK

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by beteljuice »

.. 10M up on the tower but with very little wind today 8-18mph ..
That my accuracy friend is a blatant contradiction in terms 8-)
Image
......................Imagine, what you will KNOW tomorrow !
User avatar
Repairman77
Posts: 361
Joined: Sat 17 Oct 2009 3:47 pm
Weather Station: WH1080
Operating System: XP pro SP3
Location: Cambridgeshire UK

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by Repairman77 »

beteljuice wrote:
.. 10M up on the tower but with very little wind today 8-18mph ..
That my accuracy friend is a blatant contradiction in terms 8-)
8-18mph is very little wind when you live out here in the open Fens of East Anglia. ;)
Mike.
Retired Radio and Electronics Engineer residing in Cambridgeshire, UK.
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26672
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by steve »

18 mph is dead calm, actually :lol:
Steve
User avatar
Repairman77
Posts: 361
Joined: Sat 17 Oct 2009 3:47 pm
Weather Station: WH1080
Operating System: XP pro SP3
Location: Cambridgeshire UK

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by Repairman77 »

steve wrote:18 mph is dead calm, actually :lol:
Yes Steve, I don't call it windy here until it blows me off my pushbike. :lol:

Incidentally I've just finished my Rainfall measurements for the last two decades (since Nov. 1990); in PDF format which can be found here...
http://www.mjgoodall.co.uk/Rainfall-8.pdf
if anyone is interested in rainfall for Cambridgeshire UK.

Mike.
Retired Radio and Electronics Engineer residing in Cambridgeshire, UK.
aaardvaark
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri 05 Feb 2010 12:36 pm
Weather Station: WH1091
Operating System: Windows 7 Prof 64bit
Location: Canberra, Australia

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by aaardvaark »

Mike - I was wondering if you got it all worked out satisfactorily?

From reading this and my limited experience, I think your very low readings could be due to your dressmaker's net cover which sounds as though it would hang on to the water, as well as splash lots out.

Edit: as soon as I wrote this I found another thread that you discussed this. Wouldn't you be better attaching your mesh (coarse, like mosquito netting) under the funnel inlet i.e. inside the unit? Then there's nothing to interfere, hold on to the water or splash on the outside collecting area. I haven't done any spider proofing yet until I get basic calibration sorted.

Julian
User avatar
mcrossley
Posts: 14388
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by mcrossley »

Repairman77 wrote:However another problem came to mind; a large funnel would collect even more raindrops before they started falling into the hole, in very light rain conditions. Coating the funnel with the acrylic window cleaning stuff may help though.
Think this is a 'no win' situation.
I was wondering what the perceived wisdom was here? Use something like RainEx to make the stuff bead up and run off (problem it can collect a lot of small beads before they start 'rolling'), or make the surface 'wettable' so the water tends to collect at the bottom?

Or maybe go with the RainEx and have a 'Windy Miller' or rather 'Windy Woodpecker' that constantly taps the funnel to shake the drops down! :lol:

Mark
User avatar
beteljuice
Posts: 3292
Joined: Tue 09 Dec 2008 1:37 pm
Weather Station: None !
Operating System: W10 - Threadripper 16core, etc
Location: Dudley, West Midlands, UK

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by beteljuice »

WD40 / Rocket or similar works wonders.

No matter what size your collection system there is always the viscosity / droplet run problem (or in hot weather evaporation !).

However; It can generally be said the larger your collection sytem the less overall (percentage-wise) error there will be.

Remember - In terms of 'measured' rain, meteorologically speaking, anything less (observed Vs. measurement) than 0.2mm / hr is "A trace of Rain".

You have to remember most weather measurements are actually trends and 'near enough' values.
Image
......................Imagine, what you will KNOW tomorrow !
Gina
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat 21 Feb 2009 12:41 pm
Weather Station: Nothing working ATM - making one
Operating System: OS X, Linux Mint, Win7 & XP
Location: Devon UK

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by Gina »

Since adding a large steep sided funnel to my rain gauge I've seen a great improvement. My rain gauge is now responding as I would expect.
Gina

Sorry, no banner - weather station out of action. Hoping to be up and running with a new home-made one soon.
User avatar
Repairman77
Posts: 361
Joined: Sat 17 Oct 2009 3:47 pm
Weather Station: WH1080
Operating System: XP pro SP3
Location: Cambridgeshire UK

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by Repairman77 »

I think we are always going to have problems when trying to accurately record very small amounts of rain (under 1 or 2mm) no matter how many mods we make which is a pity. However I've found the remote unit quite accurate when we get 5mm or more in an hour or two.

I guess it's just an anomaly that we'll have to put up with, and we're striving for an accuracy that we're never going to achieve.

I still use the 172mm diameter funnel rain gauge that I made for accurate recording.

Mike.
Retired Radio and Electronics Engineer residing in Cambridgeshire, UK.
User avatar
nking
Posts: 813
Joined: Thu 17 Dec 2009 2:03 pm
Weather Station: W-8681
Operating System: Windows 10
Location: Hurstpierpoint, West Sussex, UK
Contact:

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by nking »

This is probably a very stupid question but, has anyone considered/tried reducing the volume of the bucket size in the rain gauge as opposed to increasing the catchment area with a funnel? For example, use a filler so that only 0.2mm or 0.1mm of rain is required to tip the bucket. I haven’t opened up the rain gauge to check it out but I imagine the size may make this an impractical option! Keyhole surgery I guess!!
User avatar
RCE
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat 26 Dec 2009 7:59 am
Weather Station: WH1080
Operating System: Vista
Location: Sheffield UK

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by RCE »

nking wrote: I imagine the size may make this an impractical option! Keyhole surgery I guess!!
It is more a question of weight change, without enough difference in weight between full and empty buckets the tip may not occur.
====
Alan
Gina
Posts: 1885
Joined: Sat 21 Feb 2009 12:41 pm
Weather Station: Nothing working ATM - making one
Operating System: OS X, Linux Mint, Win7 & XP
Location: Devon UK

Re: WH1080 rain gauge versus graduated cylinder.

Post by Gina »

Much easier just to put a bigger funnel over the original. Improved mine no end :)
Gina

Sorry, no banner - weather station out of action. Hoping to be up and running with a new home-made one soon.
Post Reply