Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080

Rainfall values read incorrect - 'hidden multiplier'?

Topics about the Beta trials up to Build 3043, the last build by Cumulus's founder Steve Loft. It was by this time way out of Beta but Steve wanted to keep it that way until he made a decision on his and Cumulus's future.

Moderator: mcrossley

Locked
User avatar
gerardwood
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2010 7:26 am
Weather Station: Davis Vantage PRO 2
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro
Location: Musbury, nr Axminster, Devon
Contact:

Rainfall values read incorrect - 'hidden multiplier'?

Post by gerardwood »

I installed Cumulus MX yesterday, adding in all my old data from Cumulus 1. Everything generally went without a hitch, apart from a strange anomaly with the rainfall counter - what was reported as 30.45in in Cumulus 1 AND on the Davis VP2 console was showing as 38.67in in Cumulus MX (causing all sorts of fun with the records, I suddenly had 8.22in of rain falling at once).

I couldn't find any reason for this to have happened, so I reset the rain the counter via the interface, and manually corrected the data/ini files this morning. Everything looked fine again.

Today, it's rained. Davis console reports 0.27in of rain; Cumulus MX says 0.35in... again it's too high, and it looks like is the same % increase, around 27%. There's definitely no '1.27' multiplier set in config anywhere that I can see. The only thing I can think of is related to the rain collector configuration, I recall it can be set to either 0.2mm or 0.01in... and the latter is 1.27 times the former... could this be it?

Regards,
Gerard.
http://www.musburyvillage.co.uk/weather
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26672
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: Rainfall values read incorrect - 'hidden multiplier'?

Post by steve »

Do you have a metric rain gauge (despite using inches in Cumulus)?

In converting the number of gauge clicks to actual amounts, I have assumed that people using MM in Cumulus have a metric rain gauge, and those using inches have a 0.01" rain gauge. This can be over-ridden by adding a line to the [Station] section of Cumulus.ini:

VPrainGaugeType=0

Where 0 is a 0.2mm gauge and 1 is a 0.01" gauge.
Steve
User avatar
gerardwood
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2010 7:26 am
Weather Station: Davis Vantage PRO 2
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro
Location: Musbury, nr Axminster, Devon
Contact:

Re: Rainfall values read incorrect - 'hidden multiplier'?

Post by gerardwood »

Hi Steve,

Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, it's a metric VP which I choose to display in imperial. Old fashioned :)

I tried setting VPrainGaugeType=0 which appeared to make no difference on restart.

Just to be sure, I set VPrainGaugeType=1 and restarted, and it made a right mess of the rainfall records again :)

I've now put it back to VPrainGaugeType=0, and just had a look at the log files; rain counter is at 30.73 which is CORRECT. It says the day start value was 30.38, which is wrong - it was 30.46 at the start of the day. Seems to have gone backwards. Maybe it will sort itself by tomorrow. Will investigate further later.

Thanks again for you help.
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26672
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: Rainfall values read incorrect - 'hidden multiplier'?

Post by steve »

I'm curious as to why you have your rain gauge set to metric, when you want to record in inches - wouldn't it be logical to have the gauge record in the same units, to avoid conversion and rounding issues?
Steve
Locked