Sorry I do not have anything more specific to bugs or odd behaviours to report yet. It just seems pretty stable, isn't that a good thing after all?
Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080
1 week with MX and fine offset.
Moderator: mcrossley
-
xayide
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue 24 Feb 2015 10:04 am
- Weather Station: Fine Offsett WH-3080
- Operating System: Server 2012 R2
- Location: Sweden
1 week with MX and fine offset.
So just wanted to give som thoughts after first week. I must say it seems to be stable for me. Run it as a service using NSSM in Windows server 2012R2 X64. It has yet to crash or do anything out of the ordinary. Although it seems to behave differently than 1.9.4 when it comes to "lost transmission" it seems to max out the datatype. For instance when console lost solar value it spiked to Max of 3 bytes (i.e. 24bit value). Something like it happened when I had to remove the raingauge and it said 8890 mm last hour or if it was day. The rain didn't glue to the records while the value for solar rad stays on the yesterday record.
Sorry I do not have anything more specific to bugs or odd behaviours to report yet. It just seems pretty stable, isn't that a good thing after all?
Sorry I do not have anything more specific to bugs or odd behaviours to report yet. It just seems pretty stable, isn't that a good thing after all?
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26672
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: 1 week with MX and fine offset.
MX does the same as Cumulus 1 when the 'lost contact' flag is set - it ignores all of the outside data. It logs a message "Sensor contact lost; ignoring outdoor data" when it does that.xayide wrote:Although it seems to behave differently than 1.9.4 when it comes to "lost transmission" it seems to max out the datatype. For instance when console lost solar value it spiked to Max of 3 bytes (i.e. 24bit value).
C1 also has a check on 'rogue' Lux values (in the case where the lost contact flag is not set) which MX currently does not have; I'll add that to the next build.
Steve