Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V4 release 4.4.2 (build 4085) - 12 March 2025

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

If you are posting a new Topic about an error or if you need help PLEASE read this first viewtopic.php?p=164080#p164080

Solar radiation constantly higher than theoretical max

Discussion specific to Davis weather stations
Post Reply
Zackdog
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed 10 Dec 2014 4:39 pm
Weather Station: Davis Vantage Pro2 Plus
Operating System: windows XP SP3
Location: Tabernash, CO

Solar radiation constantly higher than theoretical max

Post by Zackdog »

Newbie here. I upgraded from a Weather Monitor II to a Vantage Pro2 Plus in April. This allowed me to begin using Cumulous, which is great software.

During the summer, the theoretical max solar radiation was almost always greater than the actual on the graphs. I just started keeping track of sunshine hours in relationship to my electric heat usage and discovered that now the graphs for solar look inverted. By this, I mean the theoretical max is always lower than the actual. It almost looks like the the theoretical max is really the actual. Has anyone else encountered this.

Thanks, Mark
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26672
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: Solar radiation constantly higher than theoretical max

Post by steve »

You will need to adjust the parameters of the theoretical max calculation (on the station settings screen) to get a better fit for your location. You may not get a perfect fit that works all year round, and the actual will inevitably be higher than the theoretical max on occasion anyway, due to cloud reflections and other factors.
Steve
Post Reply