Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.5 (build 3282) - 23 February 2024

Cumulus MX V4 beta test release 4.0.0 (build 4017) - 17 March 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release v1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014 (a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

Cumulus 1.9.4 beta build 1082

Please discuss beta versions of Cumulus 1 here. Note: There are currently no beta versions of Cumulus 1.
Locked
User avatar
pernaczy
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2012 5:42 pm
Weather Station: Fine Offset WH 2080, TFA Spring
Operating System: Windows 7
Location: Niesiolowice, Northern Poland
Contact:

Cumulus 1.9.4 beta build 1082

Post by pernaczy »

Hi,
After installing this new "build 1082" version, Cumulus started to show only absolute pressure and generated an error message (see attachment).
After reinstalling version 1079 which I had before, everything is OK.
Some months ago I have calbrated relative pressure on my station to be displayed correctly. An offset that was set was about 20 hPa.
I'm checking on regular basis the relative pressure on meteorological charts for my region and they show the same value as my station is shoving (after calibration).
Best Regards,
Piotr
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
The day when I have learned something is not the lost one.
Ignorance can be corrected with the help of a book. Stupidity requires a shotgun and a shovel.

Image
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26702
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: Cumulus 1.9.4 beta build 1082

Post by steve »

Unlikely to be anything to do with build 1082, the Fine Offset code last changed in 1074. How many times did it happen with 1082?

It looks like you're now using 1078, not 1079. Details matter when you're beta testing ;)

Please zip up the diags folder and attach it.
Steve
User avatar
pernaczy
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2012 5:42 pm
Weather Station: Fine Offset WH 2080, TFA Spring
Operating System: Windows 7
Location: Niesiolowice, Northern Poland
Contact:

Re: Cumulus 1.9.4 beta build 1082

Post by pernaczy »

Hi,
First of all it was my mistake saying theat reinstalled was 1079 version. In fact it was 1078. I apologise.
Second. I installed 1082 version again (after reading your reply to my post) and EVERYTHING SEEMS TO BE OK.
I have attached the diags folder with todays files (there is very strange info in file number 007 line 87).
Thank you for quick (as allways) reaction.
Best REgards,
Piotr
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
The day when I have learned something is not the lost one.
Ignorance can be corrected with the help of a book. Stupidity requires a shotgun and a shovel.

Image
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26702
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: Cumulus 1.9.4 beta build 1082

Post by steve »

pernaczy wrote:(there is very strange info in file number 007 line 87).
Yes, the memory locations which are supposed to hold the pressure data had strange values on that start up. Perhaps the station was writing the values at the same time that Cumulus was reading them. That's got me thinking - perhaps it could retry reading the pressure values a few times if it gets bad data.
Steve
Andre
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed 07 Aug 2013 8:26 am
Weather Station: WS-4000
Operating System: Windows 7
Location: Ede
Contact:

Re: Cumulus 1.9.4 beta build 1082

Post by Andre »

When i download this version a get a alarm form Norton is this a false alarm ?

WS.Reputation.1 file is removed :-(
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26702
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: Cumulus 1.9.4 beta build 1082

Post by steve »

It's not a false alarm, or any kind of alarm at all, it's Norton arbitrarily deciding that the file might be suspect without any evidence whatsoever. If you Google for WS.Reputation.1 you'll find a lot of developers unhappy about this.
Steve
User avatar
Super-T
Posts: 890
Joined: Tue 09 Sep 2008 3:37 am
Weather Station: wh-1081
Operating System: Weather Laptop - Windows 10 Pro
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Cumulus 1.9.4 beta build 1082

Post by Super-T »

"WS.Reputation.1 is a detection for files that have a low reputation score based on analyzing data from Symantec’s community of users"
Maybe this should be applied to Norton themselves? :-)
Locked