I have noticed that on my system, the NOAA annual report is recording the "min<=0" days correctly but the total at the bottom of the column only shows the total for January, not for the whole the year to date. See here: http://weather.curtisfamily.org.uk/NOAA ... hp?yr=2016
Strangely, the other things at the base of the columns (max, mins and totals) seem to be working correctly. The previous year's seems completely correct, but this was generated by previous version of cumulus.
Not serious, but I wonder if it is a bug or whether I have something set up wrongly. Everything else seems to be working fine.
Thanks
Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Cumulus MX V4 beta test release 4.0.0 (build 4019) - 03 April 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024
Cumulus MX V4 beta test release 4.0.0 (build 4019) - 03 April 2024
Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)
Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki
Small bug in NOAA annual report?
Moderator: mcrossley
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun 01 Jun 2014 4:58 pm
- Weather Station: VP2
- Operating System: OSX (windows 8)
- Location: Gatwick
- PaulMy
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 11:54 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2 Plus 24-Hour FARS
- Operating System: Windows8 and Windows10
- Location: Komoka, ON Canada
- Contact:
Re: Small bug in NOAA annual report?
It looks correct to me. Are you referring to the word "Jan" on the summary line for Temperature?
I believe that refers to the month when the lowest temperature occurred. Yours appear to be only in the month of January and in mine I have it in Dec Jan or Feb depending on the year.
Paul
I believe that refers to the month when the lowest temperature occurred. Yours appear to be only in the month of January and in mine I have it in Dec Jan or Feb depending on the year.
Paul
Davis Vantage Pro2+
C1 www.komokaweather.com/komokaweather-ca
MX www.komokaweather.com/cumulusmx/index.htm /index.html /index.php
MX www.komokaweather.com/cumulusmxwll/index.htm /index.html /index.php
MX www. komokaweather.com/cumulusmx4/index.htm
C1 www.komokaweather.com/komokaweather-ca
MX www.komokaweather.com/cumulusmx/index.htm /index.html /index.php
MX www.komokaweather.com/cumulusmxwll/index.htm /index.html /index.php
MX www. komokaweather.com/cumulusmx4/index.htm
- mcrossley
- Posts: 12756
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: Small bug in NOAA annual report?
Mine is the same, it does look like it started going wrong with MX. 2014 is correct, 2015 and 2016 are both wrong.
- PaulMy
- Posts: 3830
- Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 11:54 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2 Plus 24-Hour FARS
- Operating System: Windows8 and Windows10
- Location: Komoka, ON Canada
- Contact:
Re: Small bug in NOAA annual report?
I've redone the math, and for both of you 2015 and 2016 seems to be incorrect. Mine is correct for all years but I am still using Cumulus1 and I missed the CumulusMX topic.
Paul
Paul
Davis Vantage Pro2+
C1 www.komokaweather.com/komokaweather-ca
MX www.komokaweather.com/cumulusmx/index.htm /index.html /index.php
MX www.komokaweather.com/cumulusmxwll/index.htm /index.html /index.php
MX www. komokaweather.com/cumulusmx4/index.htm
C1 www.komokaweather.com/komokaweather-ca
MX www.komokaweather.com/cumulusmx/index.htm /index.html /index.php
MX www.komokaweather.com/cumulusmxwll/index.htm /index.html /index.php
MX www. komokaweather.com/cumulusmx4/index.htm
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun 01 Jun 2014 4:58 pm
- Weather Station: VP2
- Operating System: OSX (windows 8)
- Location: Gatwick
Re: Small bug in NOAA annual report?
Thank you.
- Werk_AG
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sun 13 Jan 2013 8:04 pm
- Weather Station: WeatherDuino 4Pro
- Operating System: Windows 7
- Location: Cercal CDV - Portugal
- Contact:
Re: Small bug in NOAA annual report?
Regarding to NOAA reports:
This is from Monthly Climatological Summary with Cumulus 1:
Days of Rain: 5 (>= 0,2 mm) 2 (>= 2,0 mm) 0 (>= 20,0 mm)
and this is with Cumulus MX:
Days of Rain: 5 (>= 2,0 mm) 2 (>= 2,0 mm) 0 (>= 20,0 mm)
Something wrong with my system, or perhaps a bug?
I'm running Cumulus MX build 3038
This is from Monthly Climatological Summary with Cumulus 1:
Days of Rain: 5 (>= 0,2 mm) 2 (>= 2,0 mm) 0 (>= 20,0 mm)
and this is with Cumulus MX:
Days of Rain: 5 (>= 2,0 mm) 2 (>= 2,0 mm) 0 (>= 20,0 mm)
Something wrong with my system, or perhaps a bug?
I'm running Cumulus MX build 3038
- steve
- Cumulus Author
- Posts: 26701
- Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
- Weather Station: None
- Operating System: None
- Location: Vienne, France
- Contact:
Re: Small bug in NOAA annual report?
What have you got for "Rain comparison 1" in the NOAA settings? Did you perhaps not change the comma to a decimal point in Cumulus.ini, if you used the file from Cumulus 1 with MX? The figure "0,2" from a Cumulus 1 ini file will probably get read as "02" in MX unless the comma is changed, as MX doesn't use commas in ini files.
Steve
- mcrossley
- Posts: 12756
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
- Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
- Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
- Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: Small bug in NOAA annual report?
My 2016 report is now correct with b3038, I have manually corrected the 2015 report.