Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Cumulus MX V4 beta test release 4.0.0 (build 4019) - 03 April 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

Possible Beaufort Number Bug

From build 3044 the development baton passed to Mark Crossley. Mark has been responsible for all the Builds since. He has made the code available on GitHub. It is Mark's hope that others will join in this development, but at the very least he welcomes your ideas for future developments (see Cumulus MX Development suggestions).

Moderator: mcrossley

water01
Posts: 3254
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2011 9:33 am
Weather Station: Ecowitt HP2551
Operating System: Windows 10 64bit
Location: Burnham-on-Sea
Contact:

Re: Possible Beaufort Number Bug

Post by water01 »

I think if that was the case somebody would have discovered it years ago in Cumulus 1 or in the early days of CumulusMX.

Suggest you show us your calculations and assumptions i.e. the proof of your statement.
David
Image
User avatar
mcrossley
Posts: 12766
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 9:44 pm
Weather Station: Davis VP2/WLL
Operating System: Bullseye Lite rPi
Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Possible Beaufort Number Bug

Post by mcrossley »

richard_newberry wrote: Sat 15 Feb 2020 9:13 pm I have worked out the wind average and its not correct.
You'll have to give a bit more detail than that Richard!
Post Reply