Welcome to the Cumulus Support forum.

Latest Cumulus MX V3 release 3.28.6 (build 3283) - 21 March 2024

Cumulus MX V4 beta test release 4.0.0 (build 4019) - 03 April 2024

Legacy Cumulus 1 release 1.9.4 (build 1099) - 28 November 2014
(a patch is available for 1.9.4 build 1099 that extends the date range of drop-down menus to 2030)

Download the Software (Cumulus MX / Cumulus 1 and other related items) from the Wiki

Correcting spurious data on Fine Offset / Wether Underground

Discussion specific to Fine Offset and similar rebadged weather stations
Post Reply
alexgray
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2010 10:58 am
Weather Station: Fine offset WH1080
Operating System: Windows XP SP3

Correcting spurious data on Fine Offset / Wether Underground

Post by alexgray »

Is is possible to retrospectively correct data sent to Weather Underground?

My Fine Offset invented a load of ridiculously heavy rain today owing, I think, to wind gusts up to 80 mph shaking the rain sensor (the rain peaks correspond exactly to the wind peaks.

Of course that has been uploaded to wunderground and is now spoiling my stats. As a temporary measure I've deleted the worst of the 5-minute entries, but of course that makes other things flatline, and removes the record of our genuine severe wind today which is a pity.

Is there any way of getting the non-rain stats reloaded manually to wunderground? If I use the standard trick of reverting to a backup data file for Cumulus it just downloads all the erroneous rain readings along with everything else from the weather station and I am back to square one!

In any event I would still need to get the correct data uploaded again to wunderground, or to edit it selectively, but I can't see any way to do that.

Alex

Alex
User avatar
Orion
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2010 5:51 pm
Weather Station: WH1081 (Maplin)
Operating System: windows 10 64bit
Location: Paignton Devon UK
Contact:

Re: Correcting spurious data on Fine Offset / Wether Undergr

Post by Orion »

Hi Alex
yes you can delete entry's but cannot find a way to change them
Last edited by Orion on Thu 03 Feb 2011 8:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26701
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: Correcting spurious data on Fine Offset / Wether Undergr

Post by steve »

If WU doesn't have a nice interface for entering readings manually, you could use the same protocol that Cumulus uses, it's just an HTTP 'GET' request. It's a bit messy to do manually. Details here: http://wiki.wunderground.com/index.php/ ... d_Protocol
Steve
User avatar
Orion
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2010 5:51 pm
Weather Station: WH1081 (Maplin)
Operating System: windows 10 64bit
Location: Paignton Devon UK
Contact:

Re: Correcting spurious data on Fine Offset / Wether Undergr

Post by Orion »

Steve would it be correct to change the real-time updates when using a FO Stations to 48seconds or 10 seconds at the moment rapid fire looks like 5 seconds
Is that how often cumulus updates Weather underground ?
If so would this work

Code: Select all

http://rtupdate.wunderground.com/weatherstation/updateweatherstation.php?ID=XXXXXXX&PASSWORD=XXXXXX&realtime=1&rtfreq=XX
User avatar
steve
Cumulus Author
Posts: 26701
Joined: Mon 02 Jun 2008 6:49 pm
Weather Station: None
Operating System: None
Location: Vienne, France
Contact:

Re: Correcting spurious data on Fine Offset / Wether Undergr

Post by steve »

Orion wrote:rapid fire looks like 5 seconds
Yes, rapid fire is fixed at 5 seconds, it would make sense for it to be less often for FO stations, but I've never got around to making it configurable.
Steve
alexgray
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2010 10:58 am
Weather Station: Fine offset WH1080
Operating System: Windows XP SP3

Re: Correcting spurious data on Fine Offset / Wether Undergr

Post by alexgray »

Thanks Steve, appreciate your quick attention.

I'll take a look at that and see if I can find a not too painful way to send in retrospective data 'manually', though it's bad enough having to delete the dud records one by one. It's a pity WU doesn't some kind of bulk import from CSV for historic data.

Alex
Post Reply